The Fatty Liver Index Has Limited Utility for the Detection and Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis in Obese Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Noninvasive tools for the detection of hepatic steatosis are needed. The Fatty Liver Index (FLI), which includes body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, triglycerides, and γ-glutamyl-transferase, has been proposed as a screening tool for fatty liver. Our objective was to validate the FLI for the detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis in an obese population.
Methods: Patients with chronic liver disease and BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2) underwent liver biopsy and FLI determination. FLI performance for diagnosing steatosis compared with biopsy was assessed using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs), and a novel model for the prediction of significant steatosis (≥5 %) was derived.
Results: Among 250 included patients, 65 % were male, and the median BMI was 33 kg/m(2); 48 % had nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and 77 % had significant (≥5 %) steatosis. The FLI was weakly correlated with the percentage (ρ = 0.25, p = 0.0001) and grade of steatosis (ρ = 0.28, p < 0.00005). The median FLI was higher among patients with significant steatosis (91 vs. 80 with <5 % steatosis; p = 0.0001) and the AUROC for this outcome was 0.67 (95 % CI 0.59-0.76). At an optimal FLI cut-off of 79, the FLI was 81 % sensitive and 49 % specific, and had positive and negative predictive values of 84 and 43 %, respectively. A novel index including triglycerides, glucose, alkaline phosphatase, and BMI outperformed the FLI for predicting significant steatosis [AUROCs 0.78 vs. 0.68; p = 0.009 (n = 247)].
Conclusions: In obese patients, the FLI is a poor predictor of significant steatosis and has limited utility for steatosis quantification compared with liver histology. A novel index including triglycerides, glucose, alkaline phosphatase, and BMI may be useful, but requires validation.
Bockarie A, Nartey Y, Nsiah P, Edzie E, Tuoyire D, Acquah S Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2023; 6(6):e456.
PMID: 37814510 PMC: 10638625. DOI: 10.1002/edm2.456.
Ajabnoor G, Bahijri S, Enani S, Alsheikh L, Ahmed M, Alhozali A Diseases. 2023; 11(1).
PMID: 36648875 PMC: 9887592. DOI: 10.3390/diseases11010010.
Sterling R, King W, Khalili M, Kleiner D, Hinerman A, Sulkowski M Dig Dis Sci. 2021; 67(2):676-688.
PMID: 33559089 PMC: 9516840. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06860-3.
Kupcova V, Fedelesova M, Bulas J, Kozmonova P, Turecky L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(19).
PMID: 31554274 PMC: 6801903. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193570.
Cheng Y, Wang Y, Lan K, Huo T, Huang Y, Su C Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017; 2017:9279836.
PMID: 28194177 PMC: 5282434. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9279836.