» Articles » PMID: 26201663

Modeling of Ammonia Emission in the USA and EU Countries Using an Artificial Neural Network Approach

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Jul 24
PMID 26201663
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ammonia emissions at the national level are frequently estimated by applying the emission inventory approach, which includes the use of emission factors, which are difficult and expensive to determine. Emission factors are therefore the subject of estimation, and as such they contribute to inherent uncertainties in the estimation of ammonia emissions. This paper presents an alternative approach for the prediction of ammonia emissions at the national level based on artificial neural networks and broadly available sustainability and economical/agricultural indicators as model inputs. The Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) architecture was optimized using a trial-and-error procedure, including the number of hidden neurons, activation function, and a back-propagation algorithm. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to reduce mutual correlation between the inputs. The obtained results demonstrate that the MLP model created using the PCA transformed inputs (PCA-MLP) provides a more accurate prediction than the MLP model based on the original inputs. In the validation stage, the MLP and PCA-MLP models were tested for ammonia emission predictions for up to 2 years and compared with a principal component regression model. Among the three models, the PCA-MLP demonstrated the best performance, providing predictions for the USA and the majority of EU countries with a relative error of less than 20%.

Citing Articles

Temporal variability of ammonia emission potentials for six plant species in an evergreen subtropical forest in southwest China.

Cui J, Wang Z, Zhang X, Mulder J, Zhang M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017; 24(11):10808-10818.

PMID: 28290087 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8650-0.

References
1.
Gruber N, Galloway J . An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature. 2008; 451(7176):293-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature06592. View

2.
Rotz C, Montes F, Hafner S, Heber A, Grant R . Ammonia emission model for whole farm evaluation of dairy production systems. J Environ Qual. 2015; 43(4):1143-58. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2013.04.0121. View

3.
Behera S, Sharma M, Aneja V, Balasubramanian R . Ammonia in the atmosphere: a review on emission sources, atmospheric chemistry and deposition on terrestrial bodies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013; 20(11):8092-131. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2051-9. View

4.
Aneja V, Blunden J, James K, Schlesinger W, Knighton R, Gilliam W . Ammonia assessment from agriculture: U.S. status and needs. J Environ Qual. 2008; 37(2):515-20. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0002in. View

5.
Antanasijevic D, Pocajt V, Povrenovic D, Ristic M, Peric-Grujic A . PM(10) emission forecasting using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm input variable optimization. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 443:511-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.110. View