» Articles » PMID: 26200905

Predictive and Prognostic Value of Ribonucleotide Reductase Regulatory Subunit M1 and Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) Treated with First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Platinum Combination Chemotherapy

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jul 23
PMID 26200905
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that expression of ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1 (RRM1) and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is associated with resistance to gemcitabine and cisplatin, respectively. We evaluated the significance of RRM1 and ERCC1 expression to predict tumor response to gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy (GP) and survival in advanced UC. We retrospectively collected tumor samples and reviewed clinical data of 53 patients with unresectable or metastatic UC, who were treated with first-line GP. RRM1 and ERCC1 expression were measured by immunohistochemistry. Among 53 patients, 12 (22.6%) and 26 (49.1%) patients had tumors that demonstrated a high expression for RRM1 and ERCC1, respectively. Twenty-nine (70.7%) of 41 patients with low RRM1 expression achieved a clinical response (complete + partial responses), but only 3 (25.0%) of 12 patients with high RRM1 expression achieved a clinical response after GP (P=0.007). Nineteen (70.4%) of 27 patients with low ERCC1 expression achieved a clinical response, while 13 (50.0%) of 26 patients with high ERCC1 expression achieved a clinical response (P=0.130). High RRM1 expression was associated with shorter progression free survival and overall survival (PFS P=0.006, OS P=0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with high RRM1 expression had a significantly greater risk of progression and death than those with low RRM1 expression. ERCC1 status was not a significant predictor for PFS and OS. RRM1 expression was predictive and prognostic of clinical outcome in advanced UC treated with gemcitabine plus platinum combination chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Prognostic value of nucleotide excision repair and translesion DNA synthesis proteins in muscle-infiltrating bladder carcinoma.

Palacka P, Holickova A, Roska J, Makovicky P, Vallova M, Biro C BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1103.

PMID: 39237917 PMC: 11376035. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12865-8.


Knockdown of RRM1 with Adenoviral shRNA Vectors to Inhibit Tumor Cell Viability and Increase Chemotherapeutic Sensitivity to Gemcitabine in Bladder Cancer Cells.

Zhang X, Taoka R, Liu D, Matsuoka Y, Tohi Y, Kakehi Y Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(8).

PMID: 33921102 PMC: 8071414. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084102.


Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer.

Koutsoukos K, Andrikopoulou A, Dedes N, Zagouri F, Bamias A, Dimopoulos M Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(22).

PMID: 33266377 PMC: 7700570. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228829.


RRM1 predicts clinical outcome of high-and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy.

Yang Z, Fu B, Zhou L, Xu J, Hao P, Fang Z BMC Urol. 2019; 19(1):69.

PMID: 31340801 PMC: 6657136. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0497-x.


Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analogues: Resistance and Re-Sensitisation at the Level of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Metabolism.

Tsesmetzis N, Paulin C, Rudd S, Herold N Cancers (Basel). 2018; 10(7).

PMID: 30041457 PMC: 6071274. DOI: 10.3390/cancers10070240.


References
1.
Bergman A, Eijk P, Ruiz van Haperen V, Smid K, Veerman G, Hubeek I . In vivo induction of resistance to gemcitabine results in increased expression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 as the major determinant. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(20):9510-6. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0989. View

2.
Lee K, Min H, Han S, Oh D, Lee S, Kim D . ERCC1 expression by immunohistochemistry and EGFR mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007; 60(3):401-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.10.014. View

3.
Jung K, Won Y, Kong H, Oh C, Seo H, Lee J . Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in 2010. Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 45(1):1-14. PMC: 3629358. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2013.45.1.1. View

4.
Yates D, Catto J . Distinct patterns and behaviour of urothelial carcinoma with respect to anatomical location: how molecular biomarkers can augment clinico-pathological predictors in upper urinary tract tumours. World J Urol. 2012; 31(1):21-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0946-6. View

5.
Kim K, Do I, Kim H, Chang M, Kim H, Jun H . Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. APMIS. 2010; 118(12):941-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02648.x. View