» Articles » PMID: 26198599

Contemporary Considerations for Constructing a Genetic Risk Score: An Empirical Approach

Overview
Journal Genet Epidemiol
Specialties Genetics
Public Health
Date 2015 Jul 23
PMID 26198599
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetic risk scores are an increasingly popular tool for summarizing the cumulative risk of a set of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) with disease. Typically only the set of the SNPs that have reached genome-wide significance compose these scores. However recent work suggests that including additional SNPs may aid risk assessment. In this paper, we used the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study cohort to illustrate how one can choose the optimal set of SNPs for a genetic risk score (GRS). In addition to P-value threshold, we also examined linkage disequilibrium, imputation quality, and imputation type. We provide a variety of evaluation metrics. Results suggest that P-value threshold had the greatest impact on GRS quality for the outcome of coronary heart disease, with an optimal threshold around 0.001. However, GRSs are relatively robust to both linkage disequilibrium and imputation quality. We also show that the optimal GRS partially depends on the evaluation metric and consequently the way one intends to use the GRS. Overall the implications highlight both the robustness of GRS and a means to empirically choose the best set of GRSs.

Citing Articles

Recurrent stroke prediction by applying a stroke polygenic risk score in the Japanese population.

Kojima N, Koido M, He Y, Shimmori Y, Hachiya T, Japan B medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39371120 PMC: 11451717. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.17.24309034.


A partitioned polygenic risk score reveals distinct contributions to psoriasis clinical phenotypes across a multi-ethnic cohort.

Orcales F, Kumar S, Bui A, Johnson C, Liu J, Huang Z J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):835.

PMID: 39261909 PMC: 11389070. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05591-z.


Health economic analysis of polygenic risk score use in primary prevention of coronary artery disease - A system dynamics model.

Vernon S, Brentnall S, Currie D, Peng C, Gray M, Botta G Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024; 18:100672.

PMID: 38828126 PMC: 11143886. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100672.


The accuracy of polygenic score models for anthropometric traits and Type II Diabetes in the Native Hawaiian Population.

Lo Y, Chan T, Jeon S, Maskarinec G, Taparra K, Nakatsuka N medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38234828 PMC: 10793530. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.25.23300499.


Interaction between genetic susceptibility to obesity and food intake on BMI in Finnish school-aged children.

Viljakainen H, Sorli J, Dahlstrom E, Agrawal N, Portoles O, Corella D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15265.

PMID: 37709841 PMC: 10502078. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42430-5.


References
1.
Cook N . Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation. 2007; 115(7):928-35. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402. View

2.
Stamler J, STAMLER R, Neaton J, Wentworth D, Daviglus M, Garside D . Low risk-factor profile and long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality and life expectancy: findings for 5 large cohorts of young adult and middle-aged men and women. JAMA. 1999; 282(21):2012-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.21.2012. View

3.
Jostins L, Barrett J . Genetic risk prediction in complex disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2011; 20(R2):R182-8. PMC: 3179379. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr378. View

4.
Wray N, Purcell S, Visscher P . Synthetic associations created by rare variants do not explain most GWAS results. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9(1):e1000579. PMC: 3022526. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000579. View

5.
Amin N, Van Duijn C, Janssens A . Genetic scoring analysis: a way forward in genome wide association studies?. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009; 24(10):585-7. PMC: 2762531. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9387-y. View