» Articles » PMID: 26188849

Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-associated Bloodstream Infections in Paediatric Oncology Patients Using 70% Ethanol Locks: A Randomised Controlled Multi-centre Trial

Overview
Journal Eur J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Jul 20
PMID 26188849
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The prevention of central venous catheter (CVC) associated bloodstream infections (CABSIs) in paediatric oncology patients is essential. Ethanol locks can eliminate pathogens colonising CVCs and microbial resistance is rare. Aim of this study was to determine whether two hour 70% ethanol locks can reduce CABSI in paediatric oncology patients.

Methods: We conducted a randomised, double blind, multi-centre trial in paediatric oncology patients (1-18 years) with newly inserted CVCs. Patients were randomly assigned to receive two hour ethanol locks (1.5 or 3 ml 70%) or heparin locks (1.5 or 3 ml 100 IU/ml), whenever it was needed to use the CVC, maximum frequency once weekly. Primary outcomes were time to CABSI or death due to CABSI.

Results: We recruited 307 patients (ethanol, n=153; heparin, n=154). In the ethanol group, 16/153 (10%) patients developed a CABSI versus 29/154 (19%) in the heparin group. The incidence of CABSI was 0.77/1000 and 1.46/1000 catheter days respectively (p=0.039). The number-needed-to-treat was 13. No patients died of CABSI. In particular, Gram-positive CABSIs were reduced (ethanol, n=8; heparin, n=21; p=0.012). Fewer CVCs were removed because of CABSI in the ethanol group (p=0.077). The ethanol lock patients experienced significantly more transient symptoms compared to the heparin lock patients (maximum grade 2) (nausea, p=0.030; taste alteration, p<0.001; dizziness, p=0.001; blushing, p<0.001), no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSAR) occurred.

Conclusions: This is the first randomised controlled trial to show that ethanol locks can prevent CABSI in paediatric oncology patients, in particular CABSI caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Implementation of ethanol locks in clinical practice should be considered.

Citing Articles

Antimicrobial Lock Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review.

Alfieri A, Di Franco S, Passavanti M, Pace M, Simeon V, Chiodini P Microorganisms. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40005772 PMC: 11857916. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13020406.


Central venous access device adverse events in pediatric patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nunn J, Takashima M, Wray-Jones E, Raj T, Hanna D, Ullman A Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(10):662.

PMID: 39283363 PMC: 11405478. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08853-0.


The Effect of Oral Care Intervention in Mucositis Management Among Pediatric Cancer Patients: An Updated Systematic Review.

Nurhidayah I, Nurhaeni N, Allenidekania A, Gayatri D, Mediani H J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:3497-3515.

PMID: 39050692 PMC: 11268750. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S467455.


Ethanol Lock for Prevention of CVC-Related Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sierra C, Rodriquez C, Bahjri K J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2023; 28(5):386-396.

PMID: 38130502 PMC: 10731934. DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.386.


Comparing ethanol lock therapy versus vancomycin lock in a salvation strategy for totally implantable vascular access device infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (the ETHALOCK study): a prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Lesens O, Forestier E, Botelho-Nevers E, Pavese P, David G, Nougarede B Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023; 43(2):223-232.

PMID: 37993679 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04702-w.