» Articles » PMID: 26184649

Patients Undergoing Substance Abuse Treatment and Receiving Financial Assistance for a Physical Disability Respond Well to Contingency Management Treatment

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2015 Jul 18
PMID 26184649
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Physical illness and disability are common in individuals with substance use disorders, but little is known about the impact of physical disability status on substance use treatment outcomes. This study examined the main and interactive effects of physical disability payment status on substance use treatment. Participants (N = 1,013) were enrolled in one of six prior randomized clinical trials comparing contingency management (CM) to standard care; 79 (7.8%) participants reported receiving disability payments, CM improved all three primary substance use outcomes: treatment retention, percent negative samples and longest duration of abstinence. There was no significant main effect of physical disability payment status on treatment outcomes; however, a significant treatment condition by physical disability status interaction effect emerged in terms of retention in treatment and duration of abstinence achieved. Patients who were receiving physical disability payments responded particularly well to CM, and their time in treatment and durations of drug and alcohol abstinence increased even more markedly with CM than did that of their counterparts who were not receiving physical disability assistance. These findings suggest an objectively defined cohort of patients receiving substance use treatment who respond particularly well to CM.

Citing Articles

The Opioid-overdose Reduction Continuum of Care Approach (ORCCA): Evidence-based practices in the HEALing Communities Study.

Winhusen T, Walley A, Fanucchi L, Hunt T, Lyons M, Lofwall M Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 217:108325.

PMID: 33091842 PMC: 7533113. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108325.


Contingency Management: New Directions and Remaining Challenges for An Evidence-Based Intervention.

Rash C, Stitzer M, Weinstock J J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016; 72:10-18.

PMID: 27746057 PMC: 5154900. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.09.008.

References
1.
Ogborne A, Smart R . People with physical disabilities admitted to a residential addiction treatment program. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1995; 21(1):137-45. DOI: 10.3109/00952999509095234. View

2.
Borsbo B, Peolsson M, Gerdle B . The complex interplay between pain intensity, depression, anxiety and catastrophising with respect to quality of life and disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31(19):1605-13. DOI: 10.1080/09638280903110079. View

3.
Petry N, Alessi S, Marx J, Austin M, Tardif M . Vouchers versus prizes: contingency management treatment of substance abusers in community settings. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006; 73(6):1005-14. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1005. View

4.
McLellan A, Cacciola J, Alterman A, Rikoon S, Carise D . The Addiction Severity Index at 25: origins, contributions and transitions. Am J Addict. 2006; 15(2):113-24. DOI: 10.1080/10550490500528316. View

5.
Morasco B, Corson K, Turk D, Dobscha S . Association between substance use disorder status and pain-related function following 12 months of treatment in primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain. J Pain. 2010; 12(3):352-9. PMC: 3008310. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.010. View