» Articles » PMID: 26175887

Sperm Donors Describe the Experience of Contact with Their Donor-conceived Offspring

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 16
PMID 26175887
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explores the attitudes and experiences of 57 sperm donors who responded to a survey posted online in the United States and indicated that they had had contact with their donor-conceived offspring or the parents of their donor-conceived offspring. On average, 18 years had elapsed since the respondents donated sperm. In the interim between donating and having contact with offspring, most had become curious about their offspring. Most made contact through a bank or online registry. Most respondents had communicated with at least one offspring at least once and most had exchanged photos with offspring. Approximately two-thirds had met in person once; the same proportion had communicated over email or text. Other forms of communication were less common. Almost half of the respondents now considered their donor-conceived offspring to be like a family member. At the same time, donors are respectful of the integrity of the family in which their offspring were raised. Donors with contact are open to having their partners and children know their donor-conceived offspring. Although contact is generally positive, donors report that establishing boundaries and defining the relationship can be very difficult. Some donors also urge those who are thinking of donating to consider the consequences and some suggest avoiding anonymity. There were no significant differences in attitudes and experiences between those who donated anonymously and those who had been identity-release for their offspring when they turned 18.

Citing Articles

Experiences and attitudes of Danish men who were sperm donors more than 10 years ago; a qualitative interview study.

Lou S, Bollerup S, Terkildsen M, Adrian S, Pacey A, Pennings G PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281022.

PMID: 36791066 PMC: 9931114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281022.


Applications to statutory donor registers in Victoria, Australia: information sought and expectations of contact.

Dempsey D, Kelly F, Horsfall B, Hammarberg K, Bourne K, Johnson L Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020; 9:28-36.

PMID: 31956702 PMC: 6957838. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.002.

References
1.
Scheib J, Riordan M, Rubin S . Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents' perspective 13-18 years later. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18(5):1115-27. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg227. View

2.
Johnson K . Making families: organizational boundary work in US egg and sperm donation. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 99:64-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.015. View

3.
Beeson D, Jennings P, Kramer W . Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(9):2415-24. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der202. View

4.
Daniels K, Lalos A, Gottlieb C, Lalos O . Semen providers and their three families. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 26(1):15-22. DOI: 10.1080/01443610400022975. View

5.
Jadva V, Freeman T, Kramer W, Golombok S . Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Hum Reprod. 2010; 26(3):638-45. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq364. View