» Articles » PMID: 26174022

Genetic Variance Components and Heritability of Multiallelic Heterozygosity Under Inbreeding

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2015 Jul 16
PMID 26174022
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The maintenance of genetic diversity in fitness-related traits remains a central topic in evolutionary biology, for example, in the context of sexual selection for genetic benefits. Among the solutions that have been proposed is directional sexual selection for heterozygosity. The importance of such selection is highly debated. However, a critical evaluation requires knowledge of the heritability of heterozygosity, a quantity that is rarely estimated in this context, and often assumed to be zero. This is at least partly the result of the lack of a general framework that allows for its quantitative prediction in small and inbred populations, which are the focus of most empirical studies. Moreover, while current predictors are applicable only to biallelic loci, fitness-relevant loci are often multiallelic, as are the neutral markers typically used to estimate genome-wide heterozygosity. To this end, we first review previous, but little-known, work showing that under most circumstances, heterozygosity at biallelic loci and in the absence of inbreeding is heritable. We then derive the heritability of heterozygosity and the underlying variances for multiple alleles and any inbreeding level. We also show that heterozygosity at multiallelic loci can be highly heritable when allele frequencies are unequal, and that this heritability is reduced by inbreeding. Our quantitative genetic framework can provide new insights into the evolutionary dynamics of heterozygosity in inbred and outbred populations.

Citing Articles

Is there an advantage of using genomic information to estimate gametic variances and improve recurrent selection in animal populations?.

Elsen J, Raoul J, Gilbert H Genet Sel Evol. 2025; 57(1):5.

PMID: 39962367 PMC: 11831845. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-025-00953-7.


Secrets and lies of host-microbial interactions: MHC restriction and trans-regulation of T cell trafficking conceal the role of microbial agents on the edge between health and multifactorial/complex diseases.

Ria F, Delogu G, Ingrosso L, Sali M, Di Sante G Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024; 81(1):40.

PMID: 38216734 PMC: 11071949. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-023-05040-y.


Bone mineral density loci specific to the skull portray potential pleiotropic effects on craniosynostosis.

Medina-Gomez C, Mullin B, Chesi A, Prijatelj V, Kemp J, Shochat-Carvalho C Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):691.

PMID: 37402774 PMC: 10319806. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04869-0.


Evolutionary transitions in heritability and individuality.

Bourrat P Theory Biosci. 2019; 138(2):305-323.

PMID: 31065879 DOI: 10.1007/s12064-019-00294-2.


Drivers of sex ratio bias in the eastern bongo: lower inbreeding increases the probability of being born male.

Malo A, Gilbert T, Riordan P Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1902):20190345.

PMID: 31064305 PMC: 6532524. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0345.


References
1.
Amos W, Wilmer J, Fullard K, Burg T, Croxall J, Bloch D . The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1480):2021-7. PMC: 1088844. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1751. View

2.
Merila J, Sheldon B, Kruuk L . Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations. Genetica. 2002; 112-113:199-222. View

3.
Kelly J, Arathi H . Inbreeding and the genetic variance in floral traits of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity (Edinb). 2003; 90(1):77-83. DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800181. View

4.
Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions M, Morley J . The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1515):653-64. PMC: 1691281. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2235. View

5.
Coltman D, Slate J . Microsatellite measures of inbreeding: a meta-analysis. Evolution. 2003; 57(5):971-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00309.x. View