» Articles » PMID: 26172136

Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Expert Consensus Statement

Overview
Journal HPB (Oxford)
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2015 Jul 15
PMID 26172136
Citations 135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA)-sponsored consensus meeting of expert panellists met on 15 January 2014 to review current evidence on the management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in order to establish practice guidelines and to agree consensus statements. It was established that the treatment of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach to optimize the chances for both durable survival and effective palliation. An adequate diagnostic and staging work-up includes high-quality cross-sectional imaging; however, pathologic confirmation is not required prior to resection or initiation of a liver transplant trimodal treatment protocol. The ideal treatment for suitable patients with resectable hilar malignancy is resection of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, as well as resection of the involved ipsilateral liver. Preoperative biliary drainage is best achieved with percutaneous transhepatic approaches and may be indicated for patients with cholangitis, malnutrition or hepatic insufficiency. Portal vein embolization is a safe and effective strategy for increasing the future liver remnant (FLR) and is particularly useful for patients with an FLR of <30%. Selected patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma should be evaluated for a standard trimodal protocol incorporating external beam and endoluminal radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy and liver transplantation. Post-resection chemoradiation should be offered to patients who show high-risk features on surgical pathology. Chemoradiation is also recommended for patients with locally advanced, unresectable hilar cancers. For patients with locally recurrent or metastatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma, first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is recommended based on multiple Phase II trials and a large randomized controlled trial including a heterogeneous population of patients with biliary cancers.

Citing Articles

Robotic surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a concise systematic review.

Aoyagi Y, Gaudenzi F, Wakabayashi T, Teshigahara Y, Nie Y, Wakabayashi G Surg Endosc. 2025; .

PMID: 40085228 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11650-3.


Improved Outcomes Following Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A 27-Year Experience.

Jain A, Lendoire M, Haddad A, Tzeng C, Boyev A, Maki H Ann Surg Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 40000564 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17075-5.


Endoscopic Stenting of a Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent with a Hole in Each Cavity in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: A Preclinical Proof-of-Concept Study and Initial Human Experience.

Lee J, Jeong S, Lee D, Lim J, Kobayashi M, Takenaka M Dig Dis Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 39856481 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08810-1.


The impact of positive resection margin in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, ductal margin vs radial margin.

Sarkhampee P, Ouransatien W, Lertsawatvicha N, Chansitthichock S, Wattanarath P Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):359.

PMID: 39589565 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03547-x.


Biliary drainage in palliative and curative intent European patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma and malignant hilar obstruction: a retrospective single center analysis.

Drews J, Baar L, Schmeisl T, Bunde T, Stang A, Reese T BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):359.

PMID: 39390363 PMC: 11468282. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03429-y.


References
1.
Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer D, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A . Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(14):1273-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721. View

2.
Pitt H, Nakeeb A, Abrams R, Coleman J, Piantadosi S, Yeo C . Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival. Ann Surg. 1995; 221(6):788-97; discussion 797-8. PMC: 1234714. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199506000-00017. View

3.
Nishio H, Nagino M, Nimura Y . Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Nagoya experience. HPB (Oxford). 2008; 7(4):259-62. PMC: 2043097. DOI: 10.1080/13651820500373010. View

4.
Halling K, Kipp B . Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnostic cytology. Hum Pathol. 2007; 38(8):1137-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.04.015. View

5.
Kobayashi A, Miwa S, Nakata T, Miyagawa S . Disease recurrence patterns after R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2009; 97(1):56-64. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6788. View