Trajectories of Childhood Neighbourhood Cohesion and Adolescent Mental Health: Evidence from a National Canadian Cohort
Overview
Affiliations
Background: The objective of this study was to examine associations between trajectories of childhood neighbourhood social cohesion and adolescent mental health and behaviour.
Method: This study used data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth, a nationally representative sample of Canadian children. The sample included 5577 children aged 0-3 years in 1994-1995, prospectively followed until age 12-15 years. Parental perceived neighbourhood cohesion was assessed every 2 years. Latent growth class modelling was used to identify trajectories of neighbourhood cohesion. Mental health and behavioural outcomes were self-reported at age 12-15 years. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between neighbourhood cohesion trajectories and outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders.
Results: Five distinct trajectories were identified: 'stable low' (4.2%); 'moderate increasing' (9.1%); 'stable moderate' (68.5%); 'high falling' (8.9%); and 'stable high' (9.3%). Relative to those living in stable moderately cohesive neighbourhoods, those in stable low cohesive neighbourhoods were more likely to experience symptoms of anxiety/depression [odds ratio (OR) = 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-2.90] and engage in indirect aggression (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.07-2.45). Those with improvements in neighbourhood cohesion had significantly lower odds of hyperactivity (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98) and indirect aggression (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.96). In contrast, those with a decline in neighbourhood cohesion had increased odds of hyperactivity (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.21-2.29). Those in highly cohesive neighbourhoods in early childhood were more likely to engage in prosocial behaviour ('high falling': OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.38-2.69; 'stable high': OR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.35-2.63).
Conclusions: These results suggest that neighbourhood cohesion in childhood may have time-sensitive effects on several domains of adolescent mental health and behaviour.
Porter D, Howell K, Napier T, Herrera C, Thurston I Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024; .
PMID: 39436633 DOI: 10.1007/s10578-024-01772-5.
Faherty L, Vagi S, Leinhos M, Soler R, Acosta J Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2024; 18:e132.
PMID: 39291362 PMC: 11483156. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2024.127.
Sharifi V, Dimitropoulos G, Williams J, Rao S, Pedram P, Bulloch A Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024; .
PMID: 38704797 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02681-7.
Gepty A, Lambert S, Ialongo N J Youth Adolesc. 2023; 52(9):1919-1932.
PMID: 37328608 DOI: 10.1007/s10964-023-01805-7.
Sadler R, Felton J, Rabinowitz J, Powell T, Latimore A, Tandon D Urban Plan. 2023; 7(4):153-166.
PMID: 37033410 PMC: 10081151. DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i4.5410.