» Articles » PMID: 26169637

Endoscopic Assessment 1 Day After Esophagectomy for Predicting Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis-relating Complications

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Jul 15
PMID 26169637
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are no useful methods for predicting anastomosis-relating complications after esophagectomy; however, anastomotic leakage remains one of the most serious postoperative complications. We retrospectively investigated the appropriateness of endoscopic examinations on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) for assessing esophageal reconstruction by analyzing the endoscopic findings 1 day after the operation and evaluating the healing process at the site of anastomosis in patients treated with esophageal reconstruction.

Methods: Between 2010 and 2013, we performed esophageal reconstructive surgery using a retrosternal gastric graft and cervical anastomosis and conducted endoscopic examinations to assess the esophagogastric anastomosis on POD 1 in 153 patients. On endoscopy performed on POD 1, we identified mucosal color change (MCC) in the proximal gastric graft as an important finding that may be indicative of local circulatory failure in gastric grafts. One week after the operation, endoscopic examinations subsequently showed significant mucosal defects around the site of anastomosis that were expected to result in anastomotic leakage as a marker of poor healing of anastomosis as well as leakage.

Results: We identified the findings of MCC in 36 patients evaluated with endoscopic examinations performed on POD 1. Furthermore, the endoscopic examinations performed 1 week after the operation revealed poor healing of the anastomosis site in 23 patients, including one patient with major anastomotic leakage. Therefore, poor healing of the anastomosis site more frequently occurred in 20 of the 36 patients (55.6%) who exhibited MCC on the endoscopic examinations performed on POD 1 than in three of the 117 patients (2.6%) who had normal endoscopic findings on POD 1 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Early endoscopy performed on POD 1 helps to predict the development of poor healing of esophagogastric anastomosis around 1 week after the operation by identifying the findings of MCC in the proximal gastric graft.

Citing Articles

The usefulness of presepsin in the early detection of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Imai Y, Tanaka R, Matsuo K, Yoshimoto H, Asakuma M, Tomiyama H Surg Open Sci. 2025; 23:75-80.

PMID: 39906219 PMC: 11791303. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.01.003.


Modification of the lesser curvature incision line enhanced gastric conduit perfusion as determined by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and decreased the incidence of anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy.

Zhao H, Koyanagi K, Ninomiya Y, Kazuno A, Yamamoto M, Shoji Y Esophagus. 2024; 22(1):68-76.

PMID: 39304552 PMC: 11717851. DOI: 10.1007/s10388-024-01089-1.


Blood flow assessment of gastric tube with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography and postoperative endoscopy during esophagectomy: indocyanine green enhancement time indicated congestion.

Sakuma J, Hoshino A, Fujiwara H, Ogou T, Kawada K, Okuno K BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):316.

PMID: 39289637 PMC: 11409529. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03398-2.


Placing vacuum sponges in esophageal anastomotic leaks - how we do it.

Hentschel F, Mollenhauer G, Siemssen B, Paasch C, Mantke R, Luth S Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):86.

PMID: 38441680 PMC: 10914858. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03272-5.


Endoscopic mucosal ischemic index for predicting anastomotic complications after esophagectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Kobayashi S, Kanetaka K, Yoneda A, Yamaguchi N, Kobayashi K, Nagata Y Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):37.

PMID: 36648542 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02783-x.


References
1.
Kawano T, Yoshino K, Endo M . Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis by the cuff technique using a stapler. J Am Coll Surg. 1996; 183(2):157-9. View

2.
Whooley B, Law S, Murthy S, Alexandrou A, Wong J . Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg. 2001; 233(3):338-44. PMC: 1421248. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200103000-00006. View

3.
Maish M, Demeester S, Choustoulakis E, Briel J, Hagen J, Peters J . The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19(8):1093-102. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8816-y. View

4.
Chasseray V, Kiroff G, Buard J, Launois B . Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989; 169(1):55-62. View

5.
Page R, Asmat A, McShane J, Russell G, Pennefather S . Routine endoscopy to detect anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 95(1):292-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.048. View