» Articles » PMID: 26164606

Neural Correlates of Lexical Stress: Mismatch Negativity Reflects Fundamental Frequency and Intensity

Overview
Journal Neuroreport
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Jul 13
PMID 26164606
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neural correlates of lexical stress were studied using the mismatch negativity (MMN) component in event-related potentials. The MMN responses were expected to reveal the encoding of stress information into long-term memory and the contributions of prosodic features such as fundamental frequency (F0) and intensity toward lexical access. In a passive oddball paradigm, neural responses to changes in F0, intensity, and in both features together were recorded for words and pseudowords. The findings showed significant differences not only between words and pseudowords but also between prosodic features. Early processing of prosodic information in words was indexed by an intensity-related MMN and an F0-related P200. These effects were stable at right-anterior and mid-anterior regions. At a later latency, MMN responses were recorded for both words and pseudowords at the mid-anterior and posterior regions. The P200 effect observed for F0 at the early latency for words developed into an MMN response. Intensity elicited smaller MMN for pseudowords than for words. Moreover, a larger brain area was recruited for the processing of words than for the processing of pseudowords. These findings suggest earlier and higher sensitivity to prosodic changes in words than in pseudowords, reflecting a language-related process. The present study, therefore, not only establishes neural correlates of lexical stress but also confirms the presence of long-term memory traces for prosodic information in the brain.

Citing Articles

Lateralization of Neural Speech Discrimination at Birth Is a Predictor for Later Language Development.

Bartha-Doering L, Giordano V, Mandl S, Benavides-Varela S, Weiskopf A, Mader J Dev Sci. 2025; 28(2):e13609.

PMID: 39807603 PMC: 11730390. DOI: 10.1111/desc.13609.


Investigating the neurocognitive background of speech perception with a fast multi-feature MMN paradigm.

Honbolygo F, Zulauf B, Zavogianni M, Csepe V Biol Futur. 2024; 75(1):145-158.

PMID: 38805154 DOI: 10.1007/s42977-024-00219-1.


ERP evidence for Slavic and German word stress cue sensitivity in English.

Ivanova M, Neubert C, Schmied J, Bendixen A Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1193822.

PMID: 37425183 PMC: 10328821. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193822.


How Tone, Intonation and Emotion Shape the Development of Infants' Fundamental Frequency Perception.

Liu L, Gotz A, Lorette P, Tyler M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:906848.

PMID: 35719494 PMC: 9204181. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906848.


Perception of Prosodic Modulations of Linguistic and Paralinguistic Origin: Evidence From Early Auditory Event-Related Potentials.

Zora H, Csepe V Front Neurosci. 2022; 15:797487.

PMID: 35002610 PMC: 8733303. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.797487.


References
1.
Heim S, Alter K . Prosodic pitch accents in language comprehension and production: ERP data and acoustic analyses. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2006; 66(1):55-68. DOI: 10.55782/ane-2006-1587. View

2.
Belin P, McAdams S, Smith B, Savel S, Thivard L, Samson S . The functional anatomy of sound intensity discrimination. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(16):6388-94. PMC: 6793181. View

3.
Pardo P, Makela J, Sams M . Hemispheric differences in processing tone frequency and amplitude modulations. Neuroreport. 1999; 10(14):3081-6. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199909290-00038. View

4.
Koso A, Hagiwara H . Event-related potential evidence of processing lexical pitch-accent in auditory Japanese sentences. Neuroreport. 2009; 20(14):1270-4. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833017af. View

5.
Ylinen S, Strelnikov K, Huotilainen M, Naatanen R . Effects of prosodic familiarity on the automatic processing of words in the human brain. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009; 73(3):362-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.05.013. View