Monaural and Binaural Contributions to Interaural-level-difference Sensitivity in Human Auditory Cortex

Overview

Journal Neuroimage

Specialty Radiology

Date 2015 Jul 13

PMID 26163805

Citations 17

Authors

G Christopher Stecker

Susan A McLaughlin

Nathan C Higgins

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in human auditory cortex (AC) to sounds with intensity varying independently in the left and right ears. Echoplanar images were acquired at 3 Tesla with sparse image acquisition once per 12-second block of sound stimulation. Combinations of binaural intensity and stimulus presentation rate were varied between blocks, and selected to allow measurement of response-intensity functions in three configurations: monaural 55-85 dB SPL, binaural 55-85 dB SPL with intensity equal in both ears, and binaural with average binaural level of 70 dB SPL and interaural level differences (ILD) ranging ±30 dB (i.e., favoring the left or right ear). Comparison of response functions equated for contralateral intensity revealed that BOLD-response magnitudes (1) generally increased with contralateral intensity, consistent with positive drive of the BOLD response by the contralateral ear, (2) were larger for contralateral monaural stimulation than for binaural stimulation, consistent with negative effects (e.g., inhibition) of ipsilateral input, which were strongest in the left hemisphere, and (3) also increased with ipsilateral intensity when contralateral input was weak, consistent with additional, positive, effects of ipsilateral stimulation. Hemispheric asymmetries in the spatial extent and overall magnitude of BOLD responses were generally consistent with previous studies demonstrating greater bilaterality of responses in the right hemisphere and stricter contralaterality in the left hemisphere. Finally, comparison of responses to fast (40/s) and slow (5/s) stimulus presentation rates revealed significant rate-dependent adaptation of the BOLD response that varied across ILD values.

Citing Articles

Playing with your ears: Audio-motor skill learning is sensitive to the lateral relationship between trained hand and ear.

Dery H, Buaron B, Mazinter R, Lavi S, Mukamel R iScience. 2023; 26(10):107720.

PMID: 37674982 PMC: 10477063. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107720.

Asymmetric hearing thresholds are associated with hyperacusis in a large clinical population.

Jahn K, Polley D Hear Res. 2023; 437:108854.

PMID: 37487430 PMC: 11075140. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108854.

Emotional sounds in space: asymmetrical representation within early-stage auditory areas.

Grisendi T, Clarke S, Da Costa S Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1164334.

PMID: 37274197 PMC: 10235458. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1164334.

Aging alters across-hemisphere cortical dynamics during binaural temporal processing.

Eddins A, Ozmeral E, Eddins D Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1060172.

PMID: 36703999 PMC: 9871896. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1060172.

Cortical auditory distance representation based on direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

Kopco N, Doreswamy K, Huang S, Rossi S, Ahveninen J Neuroimage. 2019; 208:116436.

PMID: 31809885 PMC: 6997045. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116436.

References

Jancke L, Wustenberg T, Schulze K, Heinze H . Asymmetric hemodynamic responses of the human auditory cortex to monaural and binaural stimulation. Hear Res. 2002; 170(1-2):166-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00488-4. View

Uppenkamp S, Rohl M . Human auditory neuroimaging of intensity and loudness. Hear Res. 2013; 307:65-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.005. View

Ungan P, Yagcioglu S, Goksoy C . Differences between the N1 waves of the responses to interaural time and intensity disparities: scalp topography and dipole sources. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(3):485-98. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00550-2. View

Briley P, Kitterick P, Summerfield A . Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012; 14(1):83-101. PMC: 3540274. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0356-x. View

Humphries C, Liebenthal E, Binder J . Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 2010; 50(3):1202-11. PMC: 2830355. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.046. View

Gutschalk A, Steinmann I . Stimulus dependence of contralateral dominance in human auditory cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014; 36(3):883-96. PMC: 6868976. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22673. View

Palomaki K, Tiitinen H, Makinen V, May P, Alku P . Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005; 24(3):364-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.013. View

Malhotra S, Hall A, Lomber S . Cortical control of sound localization in the cat: unilateral cooling deactivation of 19 cerebral areas. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92(3):1625-43. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01205.2003. View

Zatorre R, Penhune V . Spatial localization after excision of human auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(16):6321-8. PMC: 6763137. View

10.

Harrington I, Stecker G, Macpherson E, Middlebrooks J . Spatial sensitivity of neurons in the anterior, posterior, and primary fields of cat auditory cortex. Hear Res. 2008; 240(1-2):22-41. PMC: 2515616. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.02.004. View

11.

Salminen N, Tiitinen H, Miettinen I, Alku P, May P . Asymmetrical representation of auditory space in human cortex. Brain Res. 2009; 1306:93-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.095. View

12.

Formisano E, Kim D, di Salle F, Van de Moortele P, Ugurbil K, Goebel R . Mirror-symmetric tonotopic maps in human primary auditory cortex. Neuron. 2003; 40(4):859-69. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00669-x. View

13.

Salminen N, May P, Alku P, Tiitinen H . A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex. PLoS One. 2009; 4(10):e7600. PMC: 2762079. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007600. View

14.

Nakamoto K, Zhang J, Kitzes L . Response patterns along an isofrequency contour in cat primary auditory cortex (AI) to stimuli varying in average and interaural levels. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 91(1):118-35. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00171.2003. View

15.

Harms M, Melcher J . Sound repetition rate in the human auditory pathway: representations in the waveshape and amplitude of fMRI activation. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 88(3):1433-50. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1433. View

16.

Imig T, ADRIAN H . Binaural columns in the primary field (A1) of cat auditory cortex. Brain Res. 1977; 138(2):241-57. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90743-0. View

17.

Kyweriga M, Stewart W, Cahill C, Wehr M . Synaptic mechanisms underlying interaural level difference selectivity in rat auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2014; 112(10):2561-71. PMC: 4233271. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00389.2014. View

18.

Woldorff M, Tempelmann C, Fell J, Tegeler C, Gaschler-Markefski B, Hinrichs H . Lateralized auditory spatial perception and the contralaterality of cortical processing as studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999; 7(1):49-66. PMC: 6873307. View

19.

Kang X, Yund E, Herron T, Woods D . Improving the resolution of functional brain imaging: analyzing functional data in anatomical space. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(7):1070-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.12.005. View

20.

Phillips D . A perceptual architecture for sound lateralization in man. Hear Res. 2007; 238(1-2):124-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.09.007. View