» Articles » PMID: 26156915

Dental Students' Educational Achievement in Relation to Their Learning Styles: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran

Overview
Date 2015 Jul 10
PMID 26156915
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Objectives: In recent decades, many studies have been carried out on the importance of Kolb experiential learning theory (ELT) in teaching-learning processes and its effect on learning outcomes. However, some experts have criticized the Kolb theory and argue that there are some ambiguities on the validity of the theory as an important predictor of achievement. This study has been carried out on dental students' educational achievement in relation to their dominant learning styles based on Kolb theory in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Iran).

Methods: In a cross sectional study, Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI Ver. 3.1) as well as a questionnaire containing students' demographic data, academic achievement marks including grade point average (GPA), theoretical and practical courses marks, and the comprehensive basic sciences exam (CBSE) scores were administered on a purposive sample of 162 dental students who had passed their comprehensive basic sciences exam. Educational achievement data were analyzed in relation to students' dominant learning styles, using descriptive and analytical statistics including χ2, Kruskal-Wallis and two-way ANOVA tests.

Results: The dominant learning styles of students were Assimilating (53.1%), Converging (24.1%), Diverging (14.2%) and Accommodating (8.6%). Although, the students with Assimilating and Converging learning styles had a better performance on their educational achievement, there was no significant relationship between educational achievement and dominant learning style (P≥0.05).

Conclusion: Findings support that the dominant learning style is not exclusively an essential factor to predict educational achievement. Rather, it shows learning preferences of students that may be considered in designing learning opportunities by the teachers.

Citing Articles

Does Self-Efficacy Affect Clinical Reasoning in Dental Students?.

Nafea E Int Dent J. 2022; 72(6):872-878.

PMID: 35753843 PMC: 9676534. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.05.006.


Do learning style preferences influence the cumulative gross point average and self directed learning hours in dental students: a preliminary study.

Ganji K, Alam M, Gudipaneni R, Algarni H, Munisekhar M, Hamza M BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):493.

PMID: 35751120 PMC: 9229464. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03535-z.


Analyzing the relationship between learning styles (Kolb and VARK) and creativity with the academic achievement of dental students.

Taheri M, Falahchai M, Javanak M, Hemmati Y, Bozorgi M J Educ Health Promot. 2021; 10:252.

PMID: 34485549 PMC: 8395887. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1492_20.


Preferred Learning Styles among Ophthalmology Residents: An Iranian Sample.

Hassanzadeh S, Karimi Moonaghi H, Derakhshan A, Hosseini S, Taghipour A J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2019; 14(4):483-490.

PMID: 31875104 PMC: 6825705. DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v14i4.5457.


Learning style preferences: A study of pre-clinical medical students in Barbados.

Ojeh N, Sobers-Grannum N, Gaur U, Udupa A, Majumder M J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017; 5(4):185-194.

PMID: 28979913 PMC: 5611428.

References
1.
Curry L . Cognitive and learning styles in medical education. Acad Med. 1999; 74(4):409-13. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199904000-00037. View

2.
Al-Saud L . Learning style preferences of first-year dental students at King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: influence of gender and GPA. J Dent Educ. 2013; 77(10):1371-8. View

3.
Alcota M, Munoz A, Gonzalez F . Diverse and participative learning methodologies: a remedial teaching intervention for low marks dental students in Chile. J Dent Educ. 2011; 75(10):1390-5. View

4.
Fang A . Utilization of learning styles in dental curriculum development. N Y State Dent J. 2002; 68(8):34-8. View

5.
Armstrong E, Parsa-Parsi R . How can physicians' learning styles drive educational planning?. Acad Med. 2005; 80(7):680-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200507000-00013. View