» Articles » PMID: 26155456

Left Frontal Glioma Induces Functional Connectivity Changes in Syntax-related Networks

Overview
Journal Springerplus
Date 2015 Jul 9
PMID 26155456
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A glioma leads to a global loss of functional connectivity among multiple regions. However, the relationships between performance/activation changes and functional connectivity remain unclear. Our previous studies (Brain 137:1193-1212; Brain Lang 110:71-80) have shown that a glioma in the left lateral premotor cortex or the opercular/triangular parts of the left inferior frontal gyrus causes agrammatic comprehension accompanied by abnormal activations in 14 syntax-related regions. We have also confirmed that a glioma in the other left frontal regions does not affect task performances and activation patterns.

Results: By a partial correlation method for the time-series functional magnetic resonance imaging data, we analyzed the functional connectivity in 21 patients with a left frontal glioma. We observed that almost all of the functional connectivity exhibited chaotic changes in the agrammatic patients. In contrast, some functional connectivity was preserved in an orderly manner in the patients who showed normal performances and activation patterns. More specifically, these latter patients showed normal connectivity between the left fronto-parietal regions, as well as normal connectivity between the left triangular and orbital parts of the left inferior frontal gyrus.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that these pathways are most crucial among the syntax-related networks. Both data from the activation patterns and functional connectivity, which are different in temporal domains, should thus be combined to assess any behavioral deficits associated with brain abnormalities.

Citing Articles

Correlation between brain functional connectivity and neurocognitive function in patients with left frontal glioma.

Ueda M, Usami K, Yamao Y, Yamawaki R, Umaba C, Liang N Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18302.

PMID: 36347905 PMC: 9643499. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22493-6.


Task-Induced Functional Connectivity of the Syntax-Related Networks for Patients with a Cortical Glioma.

Tanaka K, Kinno R, Muragaki Y, Maruyama T, Sakai K Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021; 1(1):tgaa061.

PMID: 34296124 PMC: 8152871. DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa061.


Differential Effects of a Left Frontal Glioma on the Cortical Thickness and Complexity of Both Hemispheres.

Kinno R, Muragaki Y, Maruyama T, Tamura M, Tanaka K, Ono K Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021; 1(1):tgaa027.

PMID: 34296101 PMC: 8152868. DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa027.


Functional Mapping before and after Low-Grade Glioma Surgery: A New Way to Decipher Various Spatiotemporal Patterns of Individual Neuroplastic Potential in Brain Tumor Patients.

Duffau H Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(9).

PMID: 32933174 PMC: 7565450. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092611.


Eupatilin inhibits glioma proliferation, migration, and invasion by arresting cell cycle at G1/S phase and disrupting the cytoskeletal structure.

Fei X, Wang J, Chen C, Ding B, Fu X, Chen W Cancer Manag Res. 2019; 11:4781-4796.

PMID: 31213900 PMC: 6539175. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S207257.


References
1.
Ohta S, Fukui N, Sakai K . Syntactic computation in the human brain: the degree of merger as a key factor. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e56230. PMC: 3577822. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056230. View

2.
Saur D, Kreher B, Schnell S, Kummerer D, Kellmeyer P, Vry M . Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(46):18035-40. PMC: 2584675. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805234105. View

3.
de Groot M, Reijneveld J, Aronica E, Heimans J . Epilepsy in patients with a brain tumour: focal epilepsy requires focused treatment. Brain. 2011; 135(Pt 4):1002-16. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr310. View

4.
Smith S . The future of FMRI connectivity. Neuroimage. 2012; 62(2):1257-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.022. View

5.
Bartolomei F, Bosma I, Klein M, Baayen J, Reijneveld J, Postma T . How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study. Ann Neurol. 2005; 59(1):128-38. DOI: 10.1002/ana.20710. View