» Articles » PMID: 26150145

Women's Interpretation of and Responses to Potential Gynaecological Cancer Symptoms: a Qualitative Interview Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Jul 8
PMID 26150145
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore women's experiences of symptoms potentially indicative of gynaecological cancer in a community-based sample without imposing a cancer perspective.

Design: A qualitative interview study with thematic analysis of transcripts.

Participants: 26 women aged ≥30 years, who had experienced a symptom that might indicate gynaecological cancer in the past 3 months, were recruited using a screening questionnaire distributed online and in community settings.

Setting: London, UK.

Results: Women attributed gynaecological symptoms to existing illnesses/conditions or considered themselves to be predisposed to them, either through their 'genes' or previous personal experience. Normalising symptoms by attributing them to demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex) was common, as was considering them a side effect of hormonal contraception. When women raised cancer as a possible cause, they often dismissed it as unlikely. Responses to symptoms included self-management (eg, self-medicating, making lifestyle changes), adopting a 'lay system of care', or consulting a healthcare professional. Triggers to help-seeking included persistent, painful or debilitating symptoms, concern about symptom seriousness, and feeling that help-seeking was legitimised. Barriers to help-seeking included lack of concern, vague symptoms, unusual symptom location, competing time demands, previous negative experiences with the healthcare system, and not wanting to be perceived as a time-waster.

Conclusions: Attributions of symptoms potentially indicative of a gynaecological cancer were varied, but most often involved women fitting symptoms into their expectations of what was 'normal'. Normalising acted as a barrier to seeking help from a healthcare professional, alongside competing time demands and negative attitudes towards help-seeking. These barriers may lead to later diagnosis and poorer cancer survival. Our findings could be used to inform the development of interventions to encourage appropriate help-seeking.

Citing Articles

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delays and disruptions in cancer care services: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shah R, Hanna N, Loo C, David M, Mafra A, Fink H Nat Cancer. 2025; 6(1):194-204.

PMID: 39747650 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-024-00880-4.


Evaluation of online text-based information resources of gynaecological cancer symptoms.

DiSipio T, Scholte C, Diaz A Cancer Med. 2024; 13(9):e7167.

PMID: 38676385 PMC: 11053368. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7167.


Unique Considerations in Early Detection, Risk, and Awareness of Endometrial Cancer in Black Women.

Schlumbrecht M, Wright K, George S Cancer Control. 2023; 30:10732748231202952.

PMID: 37732413 PMC: 10515581. DOI: 10.1177/10732748231202952.


Healthcare use and clinical investigations before a diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a register-based study in Denmark.

Rousing I, Vedsted P, Hjertholm P, Kallestrup P, Baun M, Virgilsen L BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):169.

PMID: 37644395 PMC: 10466681. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02132-3.


Using Shopping Data to Improve the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer: Computational Analysis of a Web-Based Survey.

Dolan E, Goulding J, Tata L, Lang A JMIR Cancer. 2023; 9:e37141.

PMID: 37000495 PMC: 10131768. DOI: 10.2196/37141.


References
1.
Weller D, Vedsted P, Rubin G, Walter F, Emery J, Scott S . The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis. Br J Cancer. 2012; 106(7):1262-7. PMC: 3314787. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.68. View

2.
Macleod U, Mitchell E, Burgess C, MacDonald S, Ramirez A . Risk factors for delayed presentation and referral of symptomatic cancer: evidence for common cancers. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101 Suppl 2:S92-S101. PMC: 2790698. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605398. View

3.
Scott S, Walter F, Webster A, Sutton S, Emery J . The model of pathways to treatment: conceptualization and integration with existing theory. Br J Health Psychol. 2012; 18(1):45-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02077.x. View

4.
Cooper C, Polonec L, Stewart S, Gelb C . Gynaecologic cancer symptom awareness, concern and care seeking among US women: a multi-site qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2012; 30(1):96-104. PMC: 4479151. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cms040. View

5.
Low E, Waller J, Menon U, Jones A, Reid F, Simon A . Ovarian cancer symptom awareness and anticipated time to help-seeking for symptoms among UK women. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013; 39(3):163-71. DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100473. View