» Articles » PMID: 26147290

A Statistical Method for the Analysis of Speech Intelligibility Tests

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jul 7
PMID 26147290
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Speech intelligibility tests are conducted on hearing-impaired people for the purpose of evaluating the performance of a hearing device under varying listening conditions and device settings or algorithms. The speech reception threshold (SRT) is typically defined as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which a subject scores 50% correct on a speech intelligibility test. An SRT is conventionally measured with an adaptive procedure, in which the SNR of successive sentences is adjusted based on the subject's scores on previous sentences. The SRT can be estimated as the mean of a subset of the SNR levels, or by fitting a psychometric function. A set of SRT results is typically analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance. We propose an alternative approach for analysis, a zero-and-one inflated beta regression model, in which an observation is a single sentence score rather than an SRT. A parametrization of the model is defined that allows efficient maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters. Fitted values from this model, when plotted against SNR, are analogous to a mean psychometric function in the traditional approach. Confidence intervals for the fitted value curves are obtained by parametric bootstrap. The proposed approach was applied retrospectively to data from two studies that assessed the speech perception of cochlear implant recipients using different sound processing algorithms under different listening conditions. The proposed approach yielded mean SRTs for each condition that were consistent with the traditional approach, but were more informative. It provided the mean psychometric curve of each condition, revealing differences in slope, i.e. differential performance at different parts of the SNR spectrum. Another advantage of the new method of analysis is that results are stated in terms of differences in percent correct scores, which is more interpretable than results from the traditional analysis.

Citing Articles

Characterizing correlations in partial credit speech recognition scoring with beta-binomial distributions.

Bosen A JASA Express Lett. 2024; 4(2).

PMID: 38299983 PMC: 10848658. DOI: 10.1121/10.0024633.


Distributional regression modeling via generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape: An overview through a data set from learning analytics.

Marmolejo-Ramos F, Tejo M, Brabec M, Kuzilek J, Joksimovic S, Kovanovic V Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2023; 13(1):e1479.

PMID: 37502671 PMC: 10369920. DOI: 10.1002/widm.1479.


The Effect of Age, Type of Noise, and Cochlear Implants on Adaptive Sentence-in-Noise Task.

Taitelbaum-Swead R, Fostick L J Clin Med. 2022; 11(19).

PMID: 36233739 PMC: 9571224. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195872.


Efficient Adaptive Speech Reception Threshold Measurements Using Stochastic Approximation Algorithms.

Dingemanse G, Goedegebure A Trends Hear. 2020; 23:2331216520919199.

PMID: 32425135 PMC: 7238302. DOI: 10.1177/2331216520919199.


Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test.

Polat Z, Bulut E, Atas A Balkan Med J. 2016; 33(5):532-538.

PMID: 27761281 PMC: 5056656. DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.160180.

References
1.
Wichmann F, Hill N . The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys. 2002; 63(8):1293-313. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194544. View

2.
Brand T, Kollmeier B . Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 111(6):2801-10. DOI: 10.1121/1.1479152. View

3.
LEVITT H . Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971; 49(2):Suppl 2:467+. View

4.
PLOMP R, MIMPEN A . Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology. 1979; 18(1):43-52. DOI: 10.3109/00206097909072618. View

5.
Bench J, Kowal A, Bamford J . The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol. 1979; 13(3):108-12. DOI: 10.3109/03005367909078884. View