» Articles » PMID: 26146485

Patterns of Contraceptive Use Among Mexican-origin Women

Overview
Journal Demogr Res
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Jul 7
PMID 26146485
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mexican women in the United States (US) have higher rates of fertility compared to other ethnic groups and women in Mexico. Whether variation in women's access to family planning services or patterns of contraceptive use contributes to this higher fertility has received little attention.

Objective: We explore Mexican women's contraceptive use, taking into account women's place in the reproductive life course.

Methods: Using nationally representative samples from the US (National Survey of Family Growth) and Mexico (Encuesta National de la Dinámica Demográfica), we compared the parity-specific frequency of contraceptive use and fertility intentions for non-migrant women, foreign-born Mexicans in the US, US-born Mexicans, and whites.

Results: Mexican women in the US were less likely to use IUDs and more likely to use hormonal contraception than women in Mexico. Female sterilization was the most common method among higher parity women in both the US and Mexico, however, foreign-born Mexicans were less likely to be sterilized, and the least likely to use any permanent contraceptive method. Although foreign-born Mexicans were slightly less likely to report that they did not want more children, differences in method use remained after controlling for women's fertility intentions.

Conclusion: At all parities, foreign-born Mexicans used less effective methods. These findings suggest that varying access to family planning services may contribute to variation in women's contraceptive use.

Comments: Future studies are needed to clarify the extent to which disparities in fertility result from differences in contraceptive access.

Citing Articles

Contraceptive access and use among women with migratory experience living in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Gozzi P, Persson M, Nielsen A, Kilander H, Kagesten A, Iwarsson K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2569.

PMID: 39304878 PMC: 11414253. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19778-y.


Prevalence and dynamics of contraceptive use by type during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Western Iran.

Mahmoudiani S PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0300613.

PMID: 38502657 PMC: 10950214. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300613.


Migration and Contraception among Mexican Women: Assessing Selection, Disruption, and Adaptation.

Flippen C, Schut R Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022; 41(2):495-520.

PMID: 35685766 PMC: 9173220. DOI: 10.1007/s11113-021-09661-8.


Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Relationship Between Risk-Taking and the Effectiveness of Adolescents' Contraceptive Use.

Caudillo M, Hickman S, Simpson S Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020; 52(4):253-264.

PMID: 33372342 PMC: 10506860. DOI: 10.1363/psrh.12165.


How User Fees Influence Contraception in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Korachais C, Macouillard E, Meessen B Stud Fam Plann. 2016; 47(4):341-356.

PMID: 27859370 PMC: 5434817. DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12005.

References
1.
Kavanaugh M, Jerman J, Hubacher D, Kost K, Finer L . Characteristics of women in the United States who use long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(6):1349-1357. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c47c9. View

2.
Thurman A, Janecek T . One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(5):1071-7. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73eaa. View

3.
Frank R, Heuveline P . A crossover in Mexican and Mexican-American fertility rates: Evidence and explanations for an emerging paradox. Demogr Res. 2014; 12(4):77-104. PMC: 3931452. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.4. View

4.
Martin J, Hamilton B, Ventura S, Osterman M, Wilson E, Mathews T . Births: final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014; 61(1):1-72. View

5.
Wilson E . Differences in contraceptive use across generations of migration among women of Mexican origin. Matern Child Health J. 2008; 13(5):641-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-008-0382-9. View