Online Communication As a Window to Conspiracist Worldviews
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
In spite of the social stigma surrounding them, conspiracy theories are a common topic of public debate on the Internet. The content and tone of these discussions provide a useful insight into the structure of conspiracist belief systems and the psychological characteristics of those who believe and disbelieve in conspiracy theories. In this focused review, we relate patterns of behavior found in online comments to the broader research literature on the psychology of conspiracy theories. Most notably, as conspiracism has its basis in disbelieving a mainstream or received narrative rather than in believing a specific alternative, most conspiracist arguments tend to fall along those same lines. Finally, we examine the implications of this methodology for future research into online discussion, particularly among hard-to-research populations.
Toward a Cultural Psychology of Conspiracy Theories: A life-narrative analysis of Flat Earthers.
Pahuus K, Jorgensen M, Wagoner B Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024; 58(4):1895-1913.
PMID: 39060635 PMC: 11638274. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-024-09857-5.
Socio-technical context for insertable devices.
Heffernan K, Vetere F, Chang S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:991345.
PMID: 36478943 PMC: 9721116. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991345.
Kosarkova A, Malinakova K, Novak L, van Dijk J, Tavel P Int J Public Health. 2022; 67:1604324.
PMID: 36090829 PMC: 9458861. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604324.
Gjoneska B Front Psychol. 2021; 12:736838.
PMID: 34712182 PMC: 8545864. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838.
LOCO: The 88-million-word language of conspiracy corpus.
Miani A, Hills T, Bangerter A Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(4):1794-1817.
PMID: 34697754 PMC: 8545361. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01698-z.