» Articles » PMID: 26136717

Online Communication As a Window to Conspiracist Worldviews

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Jul 3
PMID 26136717
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In spite of the social stigma surrounding them, conspiracy theories are a common topic of public debate on the Internet. The content and tone of these discussions provide a useful insight into the structure of conspiracist belief systems and the psychological characteristics of those who believe and disbelieve in conspiracy theories. In this focused review, we relate patterns of behavior found in online comments to the broader research literature on the psychology of conspiracy theories. Most notably, as conspiracism has its basis in disbelieving a mainstream or received narrative rather than in believing a specific alternative, most conspiracist arguments tend to fall along those same lines. Finally, we examine the implications of this methodology for future research into online discussion, particularly among hard-to-research populations.

Citing Articles

Toward a Cultural Psychology of Conspiracy Theories: A life-narrative analysis of Flat Earthers.

Pahuus K, Jorgensen M, Wagoner B Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024; 58(4):1895-1913.

PMID: 39060635 PMC: 11638274. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-024-09857-5.


Socio-technical context for insertable devices.

Heffernan K, Vetere F, Chang S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:991345.

PMID: 36478943 PMC: 9721116. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991345.


Religious Conspiracy Theories About the COVID-19 Pandemic Are Associated With Negative Mental Health.

Kosarkova A, Malinakova K, Novak L, van Dijk J, Tavel P Int J Public Health. 2022; 67:1604324.

PMID: 36090829 PMC: 9458861. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604324.


Conspiratorial Beliefs and Cognitive Styles: An Integrated Look on Analytic Thinking, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Reasoning in Relation to (Dis)trust in Conspiracy Theories.

Gjoneska B Front Psychol. 2021; 12:736838.

PMID: 34712182 PMC: 8545864. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838.


LOCO: The 88-million-word language of conspiracy corpus.

Miani A, Hills T, Bangerter A Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(4):1794-1817.

PMID: 34697754 PMC: 8545361. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01698-z.


References
1.
Robbins J, Krueger J . Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: a review and meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005; 9(1):32-47. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3. View

2.
Swami V . Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: the case of the jewish conspiracy theory in malaysia. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:280. PMC: 3412387. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280. View

3.
Jolley D, Douglas K . The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e89177. PMC: 3930676. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177. View

4.
Harambam J, Aupers S . Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science. Public Underst Sci. 2014; 24(4):466-80. DOI: 10.1177/0963662514559891. View

5.
Raab M, Ortlieb S, Auer N, Guthmann K, Carbon C . Thirty shades of truth: conspiracy theories as stories of individuation, not of pathological delusion. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:406. PMC: 3705173. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00406. View