» Articles » PMID: 26136434

No Association Between Gingival Labial Recession and Facial Type

Overview
Journal Eur J Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Jul 3
PMID 26136434
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if facial type is a predictor of the development of gingival recession.

Methods: A cohort of 179 orthodontic patients (76 males, 101 females; age before treatment T S = 12.4 years, SD = 0.8) were followed until 5 years post-treatment (T 5 = 20.7 years, SD = 1.2). The presence of recessions was scored ('Yes' or 'No') by two raters on initial (T S), end of treatment (T 0), and post-treatment (T 5) plaster models. A recession was noted (scored 'Yes') if the labial cemento-enamel junction was exposed. The clinical crown heights were measured at T S, T 0, and T 5 as the distances between the incisal edges and the deepest points of the curvature of the vestibulo-gingival margins. Determination of the facial type was based on the inclination of mandibular plane relative to cranial base (Sella-Nasion/Mandibular Plane) and the proportion of posterior to anterior face heights (PFHs; SGo/NMe × 100 per cent) on pre-treatment cephalograms.

Results: From T 0 to T 5, the number of subjects with recessions increased from 2 (1.1 per cent) to 24 (13.6 per cent), and the number of recession sites increased from 2 to 39. However, most patients had either one or two recession sites. The mean clinical crown height of mandibular incisors increased by 0.86mm (SD = 0.82, P < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that mandibular plane inclination had no effect on the development of gingival recession or on the increase of clinical crown heights of mandibular incisors.

Conclusions: Facial type is not a predictor of the occurrence of gingival recession.

Citing Articles

Correlation between gingival phenotype in the aesthetic zone and craniofacial profile-a CBCT-based study.

Cha S, Lee S, Zhang C, Tan Z, Zhao Q Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 25(3):1363-1374.

PMID: 32648062 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03444-9.

References
1.
Allais D, Melsen B . Does labial movement of lower incisors influence the level of the gingival margin? A case-control study of adult orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2003; 25(4):343-52. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.4.343. View

2.
Obloj B, Fudalej P, Dudkiewicz Z . Cephalometric standards for Polish 10-year-olds with normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(2):262-9. DOI: 10.2319/011207-14.1. View

3.
Darendeliler N . The influence of extraction orthodontic treatment on craniofacial structures: evaluation according to two different factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115(5):508-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70272-6. View

4.
Karlsen A . Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN angle males: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65(5):341-50. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0341:CGDBLA>2.0.CO;2. View

5.
Xiao D, Gao H, Ren Y . Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 33(2):198-204. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq064. View