» Articles » PMID: 26134411

Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jul 3
PMID 26134411
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The oral microbiome, which is closely associated with many diseases, and the resident pathogenic oral bacteria, which can be transferred by close physical contact, are important public health considerations. Although the dog is the most common companion animal, the composition of the canine oral microbiome, which may include human pathogenic bacteria, and its relationship with that of their owners are unclear. In this study, 16S rDNA pyrosequencing was used to compare the oral microbiomes of 10 dogs and their owners and to identify zoonotic pathogens. Pyrosequencing revealed 246 operational taxonomic units in the 10 samples, representing 57 genera from eight bacterial phyla. Firmicutes (57.6%), Proteobacteria (21.6%), Bacteroidetes (9.8%), Actinobacteria (7.1%), and Fusobacteria (3.9%) were the predominant phyla in the human oral samples, whereas Proteobacteria (25.7%), Actinobacteria (21%), Bacteroidetes (19.7%), Firmicutes (19.3%), and Fusobacteria (12.3%) were predominant in the canine oral samples. The predominant genera in the human samples were Streptococcus (43.9%), Neisseria (10.3%), Haemophilus (9.6%), Prevotella (8.4%), and Veillonella (8.1%), whereas the predominant genera in the canine samples were Actinomyces (17.2%), Unknown (16.8), Porphyromonas (14.8), Fusobacterium (11.8), and Neisseria (7.2%). The oral microbiomes of dogs and their owners were appreciably different, and similarity in the microbiomes of canines and their owners was not correlated with residing in the same household. Oral-to-oral transfer of Neisseria shayeganii, Porphyromonas canigingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Streptococcus minor from dogs to humans was suspected. The finding of potentially zoonotic and periodontopathic bacteria in the canine oral microbiome may be a public health concern.

Citing Articles

Newly identified species from the dog dental plaque microbiome highlight little overlap with humans.

Heidrich V, Fackelmann G, Malesevic M, Armanini F, Dey H, Mengoni C NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025; 11(1):30.

PMID: 39966419 PMC: 11836392. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-025-00665-2.


and canine periodontal disease: Current understanding and future directions.

Kwack K, Jang E, Kim C, Choi Y, Lee J, Moon J Virulence. 2025; 16(1):2449019.

PMID: 39834343 PMC: 11756583. DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2024.2449019.


Antibiotic Susceptibility of Zoonotic Bacteria Isolated From Oral Cavities of Indigenous Dogs From Semi-Urban Areas in Uganda.

Mukasa P, Ogwang P, Owor R, Lejju J, Gumisiriza H, Ntulume I Vet Med Sci. 2024; 11(1):e70169.

PMID: 39688521 PMC: 11651091. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.70169.


The Interaction between Canine Semen Bacteria and Semen Quality Parameters.

Sorkyte S, Siugzdiniene R, Virgailis M, Vaiciuliene G, Wysokinska A, Wojcik E Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39123677 PMC: 11311067. DOI: 10.3390/ani14152151.


Revealing microbial community characteristics in healthy human, cat and canine salivas and looking for species-specific microbes.

Mei S, Cai M, Lei F, Wang X, Yuan X, Lin Y Int J Legal Med. 2024; 138(6):2259-2269.

PMID: 38985198 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03277-1.


References
1.
Lam S, Samraj J, Rahman S, Hilton E . Primary actinomycotic endocarditis: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 16(4):481-5. DOI: 10.1093/clind/16.4.481. View

2.
Booij-Vrieling H, van der Reijden W, Houwers D, de Wit W, Bosch-Tijhof C, Penning L . Comparison of periodontal pathogens between cats and their owners. Vet Microbiol. 2010; 144(1-2):147-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.046. View

3.
Marsh P . Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res. 1994; 8(2):263-71. DOI: 10.1177/08959374940080022001. View

4.
Socransky S, Haffajee A, Cugini M, Smith C, Kent Jr R . Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol. 1998; 25(2):134-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02419.x. View

5.
HARVEY C, Thornsberry C, Miller B . Subgingival bacteria--comparison of culture results in dogs and cats with gingivitis. J Vet Dent. 1995; 12(4):147-50. View