» Articles » PMID: 2612988

Defecography in Normal Volunteers: Results and Implications

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1989 Dec 1
PMID 2612988
Citations 143
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Forty seven healthy young volunteers underwent defecographic examination to determine the range of normal findings. Normality was shown to encompass radiological features often considered pathological. These features included broad ranges of anorectal angle and pelvic floor descent which overlap with reported pathological states. Furthermore, the formation of rectocoeles during defecation was a very common finding in women. Finally, a subgroup of the volunteers had marginal anorectal function. The marginal anorectal function and certain radiological findings such as rectocoeles or intussusceptions may predispose to later problems, or contribute to clinical problems when combined with other factors such as dietary fibre deficiency. The radiological findings raise a number of questions with respect to different aspects of the functioning of the continence and defecation mechanisms.

Citing Articles

High and low take-off external prolapse phenotypes can be characterised preoperatively on defaecation proctography.

Cooper E, Singh S, Yates C, Hodgkinson J, Cunningham C, Lindsey I Tech Coloproctol. 2025; 29(1):74.

PMID: 40053169 PMC: 11889069. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03093-0.


Evaluation of Perineal Descent Measurements on Pelvic Floor Imaging.

van Gruting I, Kluivers K, Stankiewicz A, IntHout J, van Delft K, Thakar R J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860553 PMC: 11766426. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020548.


Anal sphincter function in rectal intussusception and high and low "take-off" external rectal prolapse-A prospective observational study.

OConnor A, Byrne C, Heywood N, Davenport M, Klarskov N, Sharma A Colorectal Dis. 2024; 26(12):2069-2079.

PMID: 39370561 PMC: 11649865. DOI: 10.1111/codi.17191.


Laparoscopic or transanal repair of rectocele? Comparison of a reduction in rectocele size.

Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Matsuda S, Kusanagi H Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):85.

PMID: 36977940 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04373-1.


MRI defecography revisited. At-rest pelvic floor measurements with and without rectal gel. Is there a difference?.

Dawkins A, Sobieh A, Myers C, Schambach B, Nair R Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 48(4):1237-1245.

PMID: 36809560 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03849-6.


References
1.
Phillips S, Edwards D . Some aspects of anal continence and defaecation. Gut. 1965; 6(4):396-406. PMC: 1552292. DOI: 10.1136/gut.6.4.396. View

2.
Bartram C, Turnbull G, Lennard-Jones J . Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol. 1988; 13(1):72-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF01889028. View

3.
Edwards D, Beck E . Movement of radiopacified feces during defecation. Am J Dig Dis. 1971; 16(8):709-11. DOI: 10.1007/BF02239595. View

4.
Henry M, Parks A, Swash M . The pelvic floor musculature in the descending perineum syndrome. Br J Surg. 1982; 69(8):470-2. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800690813. View

5.
Bartolo D, Read N, Jarratt J, Read M, Donnelly T, Johnson A . Differences in anal sphincter function and clinical presentation in patients with pelvic floor descent. Gastroenterology. 1983; 85(1):68-75. View