» Articles » PMID: 26124739

How Our Body Influences Our Perception of the World

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Jul 1
PMID 26124739
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Incorporating the fact that the senses are embodied is necessary for an organism to interpret sensory information. Before a unified perception of the world can be formed, sensory signals must be processed with reference to body representation. The various attributes of the body such as shape, proportion, posture, and movement can be both derived from the various sensory systems and can affect perception of the world (including the body itself). In this review we examine the relationships between sensory and motor information, body representations, and perceptions of the world and the body. We provide several examples of how the body affects perception (including but not limited to body perception). First we show that body orientation effects visual distance perception and object orientation. Also, visual-auditory crossmodal-correspondences depend on the orientation of the body: audio "high" frequencies correspond to a visual "up" defined by both gravity and body coordinates. Next, we show that perceived locations of touch is affected by the orientation of the head and eyes on the body, suggesting a visual component to coding body locations. Additionally, the reference-frame used for coding touch locations seems to depend on whether gaze is static or moved relative to the body during the tactile task. The perceived attributes of the body such as body size, affect tactile perception even at the level of detection thresholds and two-point discrimination. Next, long-range tactile masking provides clues to the posture of the body in a canonical body schema. Finally, ownership of seen body parts depends on the orientation and perspective of the body part in view. Together, all of these findings demonstrate how sensory and motor information, body representations, and perceptions (of the body and the world) are interdependent.

Citing Articles

Experiencing an Elongated Limb in Virtual Reality Modifies the Tactile Distance Perception of the Corresponding Real Limb.

Le Jeune F, DAlonzo M, Piombino V, Noccaro A, Formica D, Pino G eNeuro. 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38844346 PMC: 11208980. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0244-23.2024.


Fading boundaries between the physical and the social world: Insights and novel techniques from the intersection of these two fields.

Dapor C, Sperandio I, Meconi F Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1028150.

PMID: 36861005 PMC: 9969107. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028150.


Integration of somatosensory and motor-related information in the auditory system.

Lohse M, Zimmer-Harwood P, Dahmen J, King A Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:1010211.

PMID: 36330342 PMC: 9622781. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1010211.


On the Role of Interoception in Body and Object Perception: A Multisensory-Integration Account.

Kirsch W, Kunde W Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022; 18(2):321-339.

PMID: 35994810 PMC: 10018064. DOI: 10.1177/17456916221096138.


Perceptual changes after learning of an arbitrary mapping between vision and hand movements.

Kirsch W, Kunde W Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):11427.

PMID: 35794174 PMC: 9259624. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15579-8.


References
1.
Iwamura Y, Tanaka M, Iriki A, Taoka M, Toda T . Processing of tactile and kinesthetic signals from bilateral sides of the body in the postcentral gyrus of awake monkeys. Behav Brain Res. 2002; 135(1-2):185-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00164-x. View

2.
Coslett H, Lie E . Bare hands and attention: evidence for a tactile representation of the human body. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42(14):1865-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.002. View

3.
Longo M . Three-dimensional coherence of the conscious body image. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014; 68(6):1116-23. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.975731. View

4.
Roder B, Rosler F, Spence C . Early vision impairs tactile perception in the blind. Curr Biol. 2004; 14(2):121-4. View

5.
DAmour S, Harris L . Contralateral tactile masking between forearms. Exp Brain Res. 2013; 232(3):821-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3791-y. View