» Articles » PMID: 26124497

Prognostic Significance of Minimal Residual Disease in High Risk B-ALL: a Report from Children's Oncology Group Study AALL0232

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is highly prognostic in pediatric B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). In Children's Oncology Group high-risk B-ALL study AALL0232, we investigated MRD in subjects randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design to receive either high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) or Capizzi methotrexate (C-MTX) during interim maintenance (IM) or prednisone or dexamethasone during induction. Subjects with end-induction MRD ≥0.1% or those with morphologic slow early response were nonrandomly assigned to receive a second IM and delayed intensification phase. MRD was measured by 6-color flow cytometry in 1 of 2 reference labs, with excellent agreement between the two. Subjects with end-induction MRD <0.01% had a 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 87% ± 1% vs 74% ± 4% for those with MRD 0.01% to 0.1%; increasing MRD amounts was associated with progressively worse outcome. Subjects converting from MRD positive to negative by end consolidation had a relatively favorable 79% ± 5% 5-year disease-free survival vs 39% ± 7% for those with MRD ≥0.01%. Although HD-MTX was superior to C-MTX, MRD retained prognostic significance in both groups (86% ± 2% vs 58% ± 4% for MRD-negative vs positive C-MTX subjects; 88% ± 2% vs 68% ± 4% for HD-MTX subjects). Intensified therapy given to subjects with MRD >0.1% did not improve either 5-year EFS or overall survival (OS). However, these subjects showed an early relapse rate similar to that seen in MRD-negative ones, with EFS/OS curves for patients with 0.1% to 1% MRD crossing those with 0.01% to 0.1% MRD at 3 and 4 years, thus suggesting that the intensified therapy altered the disease course of MRD-positive subjects. Additional interventions targeted at the MRD-positive group may further improve outcome. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00075725.

Citing Articles

Health-related Quality of Life in children and adolescents treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), compared with healthy peers: a longitudinal study of early survivorship.

Premaratne G, McCarthy M, Tennant M, Downie P, Hearps S, De Luca C J Cancer Surviv. 2024; .

PMID: 39722082 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01736-7.


Very early remission and increased apoptosis with the use of Pentoxifylline in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Salceda-Rivera V, Ortiz-Lazareno P, Hernandez-Flores G, Vazquez-Urrutia J, Meza-Arroyo J, Pardo-Zepeda M Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1401262.

PMID: 39421449 PMC: 11484046. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1401262.


Cerebrospinal fluid liquid biopsy by low-pass whole genome sequencing for clinical disease monitoring in pediatric embryonal tumors.

Crotty E, Paulson V, Ronsley R, Vitanza N, Lee A, Hauptman J Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae126.

PMID: 39290875 PMC: 11407906. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae126.


Antimetabolite dose intensity and adverse outcomes in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a COG-AALL03N1 report.

Wadhwa A, Chen Y, Hageman L, Angiolillo A, Dickens D, Neglia J Blood. 2024; 144(22):2327-2335.

PMID: 39190431 PMC: 11619787. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024024455.


The potential role of RNA sequencing in diagnosing unexplained insensitivity to conventional chemotherapy in pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Li X, Huang Z, Zhu L, Lai W, Li Y, Chen H BMC Med Genomics. 2024; 17(1):149.

PMID: 38811988 PMC: 11137891. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-024-01892-w.


References
1.
Coustan-Smith E, Sancho J, Behm F, Hancock M, Razzouk B, Ribeiro R . Prognostic importance of measuring early clearance of leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2002; 100(1):52-8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0006. View

2.
Dworzak M, Froschl G, Printz D, Mann G, Potschger U, Muhlegger N . Prognostic significance and modalities of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2002; 99(6):1952-8. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v99.6.1952. View

3.
Borowitz M, Pullen D, Shuster J, Viswanatha D, Montgomery K, Willman C . Minimal residual disease detection in childhood precursor-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: relation to other risk factors. A Children's Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2003; 17(8):1566-72. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403001. View

4.
Gabert J, Beillard E, van der Velden V, Bi W, Grimwade D, Pallisgaard N . Standardization and quality control studies of 'real-time' quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia - a Europe Against Cancer program. Leukemia. 2003; 17(12):2318-57. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403135. View

5.
Cazzaniga G, Gaipa G, Rossi V, Biondi A . Minimal residual disease as a surrogate marker for risk assignment to ALL patients. Rev Clin Exp Hematol. 2004; 7(3):292-323. View