» Articles » PMID: 26111112

Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-weighted MRI for Detection of Pelvic Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Cervical Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Jun 26
PMID 26111112
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI has emerged as a new technique for detecting the pelvic lymph metastases in patients with cervical cancer. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic value of DW imaging (DWI) for benign/malignant discrimination of pelvic lymph nodes (LNs). Studies about DWI for the detection of metastatic LNs were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, EBSCO, the Cochrane Library and three Chinese databases. Based on the extracted data, we determined pooled sensitivities, specificities and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) and Q* obtained. We also analysed the heterogeneity between studies based on subgroup analysis, threshold effect and publication bias. In total, 15 studies involving 1021 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of DWI were 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84-0.89], 0.84 (95% CI, 0.83-0.86) and 47.21 (95% CI, 25.67-86.81), respectively. LR syntheses yielded overall positive LR of 6.55 (95% CI, 4.77-9.01) and negative LR of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.12-0.23). The AUC and Q* index were 0.9384 and 0.8754, respectively. The heterogeneity was relatively high between studies; however, there was no evidence for threshold effect and publication bias. DWI is beneficial in the pelvic nodal assessment in patients with cervical cancer. Large-scale, high-quality trials with standard protocols are required to evaluate its clinical value for discrimination of metastatic from non-metastatic pelvic LNs in patients with cervical cancer. Advances in knowledge include providing evidence to assess the role of DWI in nodal staging of cervical cancer.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Ia1-Ib1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Multi-Center Study with 10 Years' Experiences in the Real World.

Zhang C, Tian W, Zhou X, Li L, Tan S, Sun L Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(3):2213-2222.

PMID: 39739265 PMC: 11811253. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16637-3.


The role of lymph nodes in cervical cancer: incidence and identification of lymph node metastases-a literature review.

Olthof E, van der Aa M, Adam J, Stalpers L, Wenzel H, van der Velden J Int J Clin Oncol. 2021; 26(9):1600-1610.

PMID: 34241726 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01980-2.


The MR radiomic signature can predict preoperative lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Qu J, Shen C, Qin J, Wang Z, Liu Z, Guo J Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(2):906-914.

PMID: 30039220 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5583-z.


Early Cervical Cancer: Current Dilemmas of Staging and Surgery.

Zigras T, Lennox G, Willows K, Covens A Curr Oncol Rep. 2017; 19(8):51.

PMID: 28664470 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0614-5.


Differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer patients using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Wu Q, Zheng D, Shi L, Liu M, Wang M, Shi D Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(12):5272-5279.

PMID: 28534163 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4873-1.

References
1.
Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu K, Subak L, Segal M . Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1997; 278(13):1096-101. View

2.
Jezzard P, Barnett A, Pierpaoli C . Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 39(5):801-12. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390518. View

3.
Choi E, Kim J, Choi H, Park S, Park B, Kim N . Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19(8):2024-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1350-5. View

4.
Arbyn M, Antoine J, Valerianova Z, Magi M, Stengrevics A, Smailyte G . Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania. Tumori. 2010; 96(4):517-23. DOI: 10.1177/030089161009600402. View

5.
Chen Y, Liao J, Xie R, Chen G, Chen G . Discrimination of metastatic from hyperplastic pelvic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2009; 36(1):102-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-009-9590-z. View