Scale Adjustments to Facilitate Two-Dimensional Measurements in OCT Images
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To address the problem of unequal scales for the measurement of two-dimensional structures in OCT images, and demonstrate the use of intra¬ocular objects of known dimensions in the murine eye for the equal calibration of axes.
Methods: The first part of this work describes the mathematical foundation of major distortion effects introduced by X-Y scaling differences. Illustrations were generated with CorelGraph X3 software. The second part bases on image data obtained with a HRA2 Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering) in SV129 wild-type mice. Subretinally and intravitreally implanted microbeads, alginate capsules with a diameter of 154±5 μm containing GFP-marked mesenchymal stem cells (CellBeads), were used as intraocular objects for calibration.
Results: The problems encountered with two-dimensional measurements in cases of unequal scales are demonstrated and an estimation of the resulting errors is provided. Commonly, the Y axis is reliably calibrated using outside standards like histology or manufacturer data. We show here that intraocular objects like dimensionally stable spherical alginate capsules allow for a two-dimensional calibration of the acquired OCT raw images by establishing a relation between X and Y axis data. For our setup, a correction factor of about 3.3 was determined using both epiretinally and subretinally positioned beads (3.350 ± 0.104 and 3.324 ± 0.083, respectively).
Conclusions: In this work, we highlight the distortion-related problems in OCT image analysis induced by unequal X and Y scales. As an exemplary case, we provide data for a two-dimensional in vivo OCT image calibration in mice using intraocular alginate capsules. Our results demonstrate the need for a proper two-dimensional calibration of OCT data, and we believe that equal scaling will certainly improve the efficiency of OCT image analysis.
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Curvature Can Predict Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Cheung R, Trinh M, Nivison-Smith L Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(12):7.
PMID: 39365260 PMC: 11460567. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.12.7.
Moussa G, Jalil A, Lippera M, Alnafisee N, Ivanova T BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024; 9(1).
PMID: 39153755 PMC: 11331849. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001531.
The Mongolian gerbil as an advanced model to study cone system physiology.
Gunter A, Belhadj S, Seeliger M, Muhlfriedel R Front Cell Neurosci. 2024; 18:1339282.
PMID: 38333056 PMC: 10850313. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1339282.
Gunter A, Sothilingam V, Orlich M, Nordheim A, Seeliger M, Muhlfriedel R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).
PMID: 37628776 PMC: 10454173. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612597.
Grytz R, El Hamdaoui M, Fuchs P, Fazio M, McNabb R, Kuo A Biomed Opt Express. 2022; 13(2):1070-1086.
PMID: 35284162 PMC: 8884212. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.447595.