» Articles » PMID: 26108654

The Smoking Population in the USA and EU is Softening Not Hardening

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2015 Jun 26
PMID 26108654
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It has been argued that as smoking prevalence declines in countries, the smokers that remain include higher proportions of those who are unwilling or unable to quit (a process known as 'hardening'). Smokeless tobacco and e-cigarettes have been promoted as a strategy to deal with such smokers. If hardening is occurring, there would be a positive association between smoking prevalence and quitting, with less quitting at lower prevalence. There would also be a neutral or negative association between prevalence and the number of cigarettes smoked.

Methods: We examined US state-level associations using the Tobacco Use Supplement (1992/1993-2010/2011) and Eurobarometer surveys for 31 European countries (2006-2009-2012) using regressions of quit attempts, quit ratios, and number of cigarettes smoked on smoking prevalence over time.

Results: For each 1% drop in smoking prevalence, quit attempts increase by 0.55%±.07 (p<0.001) in the USA and remain stable in Europe (p=0.53), US quit ratios increase by 1.13%±0.06 (p<0.001), and consumption drops by 0.32 cig/day±0.02 (p<0.001) in the USA and 0.22 cig/day±0.05 (p<0.001) in Europe. These associations remain stable over time (p>0.24), with significantly lower consumption at any given prevalence level as time passed in the USA (-0.15 (cig/day)/year±0.06, p<0.05).

Conclusions: Consistent with prior research using different data and methods, these population-level results reject the hypothesis of hardening as smoking prevalence drops, instead supporting softening of the smoking population as prevalence declines.

Citing Articles

A cross-sectional investigation of softening indicators among South African smokers: Results from the South African Social Attitudes Survey between 2007 and 2018.

Egbe C, Kulik M, Londani M, Ngobese S, Ayo-Yusuf O Prev Med Rep. 2022; 27:101785.

PMID: 35656217 PMC: 9152784. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101785.


Smokers Increasingly Motivated and Able to Quit as Smoking Prevalence Falls: Umbrella and Systematic Review of Evidence Relevant to the "Hardening Hypothesis," Considering Transcendence of Manufactured Doubt.

Harris M, Martin M, Yazidjoglou A, Ford L, Lucas R, Newman E Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 24(8):1321-1328.

PMID: 35239960 PMC: 9278822. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac055.


Prevalence and Predictors of Hardcore Smoking in India-: Findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (2016-2017).

Banerjee S, Tripathy J, Bandyopadhyay K, Deshmukh P Indian J Community Med. 2022; 46(4):710-714.

PMID: 35068740 PMC: 8729276. DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_954_20.


Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.

Gunadi C, Benmarhnia T, White M, Pierce J, McMenamin S, Leas E PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0257553.

PMID: 34644338 PMC: 8513910. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257553.


Changes in adult smoking behaviours in ten global adult tobacco survey (GATS) countries during 2008-2018 - a test of 'hardening' hypothesis'.

Sreeramareddy C, Aye S BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1209.

PMID: 34167508 PMC: 8223378. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11201-0.


References
1.
Kulik M, Menvielle G, Eikemo T, Bopp M, Jasilionis D, Kulhanova I . Educational inequalities in three smoking-related causes of death in 18 European populations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; 16(5):507-18. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt175. View

2.
Augustson E, Marcus S . Use of the current population survey to characterize subpopulations of continued smokers: a national perspective on the "hardcore" smoker phenomenon. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6(4):621-9. DOI: 10.1080/14622200410001727876. View

3.
Costa M, Cohen J, Chaiton M, Ip D, McDonald P, Ferrence R . "Hardcore" definitions and their application to a population-based sample of smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010; 12(8):860-4. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq103. View

4.
Docherty G, McNeill A . The hardening hypothesis: does it matter?. Tob Control. 2012; 21(2):267-8. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050382. View

5.
Cohen J, McDonald P, Selby P . Softening up on the hardening hypothesis. Tob Control. 2012; 21(2):265-6. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050381. View