» Articles » PMID: 26098125

Descriptive Norms and Expectancies As Mediators of a Brief Motivational Intervention for Mandated College Students Receiving Stepped Care for Alcohol Use

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2015 Jun 23
PMID 26098125
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stepped care approaches for mandated college students provide individual brief motivational interventions (BMI) only for individuals who do not respond to an initial, low-intensity level of treatment such as Brief Advice (BA). However, how BMIs facilitate change in this higher-risk group of mandated students remains unclear. Perceived descriptive norms and alcohol-related expectancies are the most commonly examined mediators of BMI efficacy but have yet to be examined in the context of stepped care. Participants were mandated college students (N = 598) participating in a stepped care trial in which mandated students first received BA. Those who reported continued risky drinking 6 weeks following a BA session were randomized to either a single-session BMI (N = 163) or an assessment-only comparison condition (AO; N = 165). BMI participants reduced alcohol-related problems at the 9 month follow up significantly more than AO participants. Multiple mediation analyses using bootstrapping techniques examined whether perceived descriptive norms and alcohol-related expectancies mediated the observed outcomes. Reductions in perceptions of average student drinking (B = -.24; 95% CI [-.61, -.04]) and negative expectancies (B = -.13; 95% CI [-.38, -.01]) mediated the BMI effects. Furthermore, perceived average student norms were reduced after the BMI to levels approximating those of students who had exhibited lower risk drinking following the BA session. Findings highlight the utility of addressing perceived norms and expectancies in BMIs, especially for students who have not responded to less intensive prevention efforts.

Citing Articles

Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.

Schwenker R, Dietrich C, Hirpa S, Nothacker M, Smedslund G, Frese T Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 12:CD008063.

PMID: 38084817 PMC: 10714668. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.


Thirty years of BASICS: Dissemination and implementation progress and challenges.

Larimer M, Kilmer J, Cronce J, Hultgren B, Gilson M, Lee C Psychol Addict Behav. 2021; 36(6):664-677.

PMID: 34914406 PMC: 11187602. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000794.


Transitions Catalyst Model: Testing within- and between-Person Associations between Social Relationships and Alcohol Use, Motives, and Consequences among Young Adults.

Duckworth J, Rhew I, Fairlie A, Patrick M, Schulenberg J, Maggs J Subst Use Misuse. 2021; 56(10):1411-1420.

PMID: 34126857 PMC: 8827109. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1928207.


Behavioral and Cerebral Impairments Associated with Binge Drinking in Youth: A Critical Review.

Lannoy S, Billieux J, Dormal V, Maurage P Psychol Belg. 2019; 59(1):116-155.

PMID: 31328014 PMC: 6625552. DOI: 10.5334/pb.476.


Learning From Experience? The Influence of Positive and Negative Alcohol-Related Consequences on Next-Day Alcohol Expectancies and Use Among College Drinkers.

Lee C, Rhew I, Patrick M, Fairlie A, Cronce J, Larimer M J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018; 79(3):465-473.

PMID: 29885155 PMC: 6005254. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.465.


References
1.
Borsari B, Boyle K, Hustad J, Barnett N, Tevyaw T, Kahler C . Drinking before drinking: pregaming and drinking games in mandated students. Addict Behav. 2007; 32(11):2694-705. PMC: 2094391. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.003. View

2.
Miller M, Leffingwell T . What do college student drinkers want to know? Student perceptions of alcohol-related feedback. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013; 27(1):214-22. DOI: 10.1037/a0031380. View

3.
Baer J, Stacy A, Larimer M . Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. J Stud Alcohol. 1991; 52(6):580-6. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.580. View

4.
Barnett N, Borsari B, Hustad J, Tevyaw T, Colby S, Kahler C . Profiles of college students mandated to alcohol intervention. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008; 69(5):684-94. PMC: 2575397. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.684. View

5.
Butler L, Silvestri M, Correia C . Student perceptions of specific components within a personalized feedback intervention. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014; 28(2):614-8. DOI: 10.1037/a0036485. View