» Articles » PMID: 26097484

Epi-fingerprinting and Epi-interventions for Improved Crop Production and Food Quality

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2015 Jun 23
PMID 26097484
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increasing crop production at a time of rapid climate change represents the greatest challenge facing contemporary agricultural research. Our understanding of the genetic control of yield derives from controlled field experiments designed to minimize environmental variance. In spite of these efforts there is substantial residual variability among plants attributable to Genotype × Environment interactions. Recent advances in the field of epigenetics have revealed a plethora of gene control mechanisms that could account for much of this unassigned variation. These systems act as a regulatory interface between the perception of the environment and associated alterations in gene expression. Direct intervention of epigenetic control systems hold the enticing promise of creating new sources of variability that could enhance crop performance. Equally, understanding the relationship between various epigenetic states and responses of the crop to specific aspects of the growing environment (epigenetic fingerprinting) could allow for a more tailored approach to plant agronomy. In this review, we explore the many ways in which epigenetic interventions and epigenetic fingerprinting can be deployed for the improvement of crop production and quality.

Citing Articles

β-Aminobutyric acid promotes stress tolerance, physiological adjustments, as well as broad epigenetic changes at DNA and RNA nucleobases in field elms (Ulmus minor).

Hoenicka H, Bein S, Starczak M, Graf W, Hanelt D, Gackowski D BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):779.

PMID: 39148013 PMC: 11325618. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05425-6.


Epigenetic differences between wild and cultivated grapevines highlight the contribution of DNA methylation during crop domestication.

Rodriguez-Izquierdo A, Carrasco D, Anand L, Magnani R, Catarecha P, Arroyo-Garcia R BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):504.

PMID: 38840239 PMC: 11155169. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05197-z.


A wide foodomics approach coupled with metagenomics elucidates the environmental signature of potatoes.

Boutsika A, Michailidis M, Ganopoulou M, Dalakouras A, Skodra C, Xanthopoulou A iScience. 2023; 26(1):105917.

PMID: 36691616 PMC: 9860355. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105917.


Uncovering the Epigenetic Marks Involved in Mediating Salt Stress Tolerance in Plants.

Singroha G, Kumar S, Gupta O, Singh G, Sharma P Front Genet. 2022; 13:811732.

PMID: 35495170 PMC: 9053670. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.811732.


Wheat grain proteomic and protein-metabolite interactions analyses provide insights into plant growth promoting bacteria-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-wheat interactions.

Yadav R, Chakraborty S, Ramakrishna W Plant Cell Rep. 2022; 41(6):1417-1437.

PMID: 35396966 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-022-02866-x.


References
1.
Chaudhry M . Strategies for detecting genomic DNA methylation: a survey of US patents. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq. 2010; 4(2):79-85. DOI: 10.2174/187221510793205719. View

2.
Nic-Can G, Lopez-Torres A, Barredo-Pool F, Wrobel K, Loyola-Vargas V, Rojas-Herrera R . New insights into somatic embryogenesis: leafy cotyledon1, baby boom1 and WUSCHEL-related homeobox4 are epigenetically regulated in Coffea canephora. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e72160. PMC: 3748027. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072160. View

3.
Polaczek P, Kwan K, Campbell J . GATC motifs may alter the conformation of DNA depending on sequence context and N6-adenine methylation status: possible implications for DNA-protein recognition. Mol Gen Genet. 1998; 258(5):488-93. DOI: 10.1007/s004380050759. View

4.
Turlings T, Ton J . Exploiting scents of distress: the prospect of manipulating herbivore-induced plant odours to enhance the control of agricultural pests. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006; 9(4):421-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.010. View

5.
Goettel W, Messing J . Paramutagenicity of a p1 epiallele in maize. Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 126(1):159-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1970-z. View