» Articles » PMID: 26095003

Spine Metastases: Are Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques Living Up to the Hype?

Overview
Journal CNS Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Jun 23
PMID 26095003
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Surgery is still considered the mainstay treatment of spine metastases. However, conventional surgery is associated with a high complication rate that may delay the initiation of adjuvant therapies and make some patients not eligible. Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been developed to overcome these drawbacks while providing the same benefits than standard open surgery. In recent years, there has been a flourishing enthusiasm demonstrating the advantages of these various techniques. Although, it is clear that these techniques have greatly improved the treatment of spine metastases, each has its own limitations. In this report, we list the main minimally invasive surgical techniques emphasizing their advantages and drawbacks.

Citing Articles

Interventional Procedures for Vertebral Diseases: Spinal Tumor Ablation, Vertebral Augmentation, and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation-A Scoping Review.

Tieppo Francio V, Gill B, Rupp A, Sack A, Sayed D Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(11).

PMID: 34828599 PMC: 8624649. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9111554.


The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain.

Aman M, Mahmoud A, Deer T, Sayed D, Hagedorn J, Brogan S J Pain Res. 2021; 14:2139-2164.

PMID: 34295184 PMC: 8292624. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S315585.


Treatment of spine metastases in cancer: a review.

Chen Y, He Y, Zhao C, Li X, Zhou C, Hirsch F J Int Med Res. 2019; 48(4):300060519888107.

PMID: 31878807 PMC: 7607531. DOI: 10.1177/0300060519888107.


Use of percutaneous microwave ablation for the treatment of bone tumors: a retrospective study of clinical outcomes in 47 patients.

Wu M, Xiao L, Yan F, Chen S, Zhang C, Lei J Cancer Imaging. 2019; 19(1):87.

PMID: 31849340 PMC: 6918630. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-019-0275-8.

References
1.
Helweg-Larsen S, Sorensen P . Symptoms and signs in metastatic spinal cord compression: a study of progression from first symptom until diagnosis in 153 patients. Eur J Cancer. 1994; 30A(3):396-8. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90263-1. View

2.
BRIHAYE J, Ectors P, Lemort M, Van Houtte P . The management of spinal epidural metastases. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 1988; 16:121-76. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6954-4_4. View

3.
Kim R, Spencer S, Meredith R, Weppelmann B, Lee J, Smith J . Extradural spinal cord compression: analysis of factors determining functional prognosis--prospective study. Radiology. 1990; 176(1):279-82. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.176.1.2353102. View

4.
Zairi F, Marinho P, Bouras A, Allaoui M, Assaker R . Recent concepts in the management of thoracolumbar spine metastasis. J Neurosurg Sci. 2013; 57(1):45-54. View

5.
Fourney D, Schomer D, Nader R, Chlan-Fourney J, Suki D, Ahrar K . Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98(1 Suppl):21-30. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2003.98.1.0021. View