» Articles » PMID: 26089737

Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability of Maximum Inspiratory Pressure Measured Using a Portable Capsule-sensing Pressure Gauge Device in Healthy Adults

Overview
Date 2015 Jun 20
PMID 26089737
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Measurement of maximum inspiratory pressure is the most prevalent method used in clinical practice to assess the strength of the inspiratory muscles. Although there are many devices available for the assessment of inspiratory muscle strength, there is a dearth of literature describing the reliability of devices that can be used in clinical patient assessment. The capsule-sensing pressure gauge (CSPG-V) is a new tool that measures the strength of inspiratory muscles; it is easy to use, noninvasive, inexpensive and lightweight.

Objective: To test the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a CSPG-V device in healthy adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 80 adult subjects with a mean (± SD) age of 22±3 years was performed. Using simple randomization, 40 individuals (20 male, 20 female) were used for intrarater and 40 (20 male, 20 female) were used for inter-rater reliability testing of the CSPG-V device. The subjects performed three inspiratory efforts, which were sustained for at least 3 s; the best of the three readings was used for intra- and inter-rater comparison. The intra- and inter-rater reliability were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: The intrarater reliability ICC was 0.962 and the inter-rater reliability ICC was 0.922.

Conclusion: Results of the present study suggest that maximum inspiratory pressure measured using a CSPG-V device has excellent intraand inter-rater reliability, and can be used as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in patients with respiratory muscle impairment.

Citing Articles

Psychometric properties of volitional tests used to measure respiratory muscle strength and endurance: A systematic review.

Queiroz Pires T, Prata Martinez B, Marcos L, Resende Ramos I, Pinheiro V, Gomes Neto M Can J Respir Ther. 2025; 61:33-43.

PMID: 40062234 PMC: 11890114. DOI: 10.29390/001c.131842.


Reliability and Validity of Maximal Respiratory Pressures.

Silveira B, Pereira H, Chaves G, Ho D, Parreira V Respir Care. 2024; 69(7):881-890.

PMID: 38688546 PMC: 11285497. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10641.


Effects of Muscle Energy Technique and Joint Manipulation on Pulmonary Functions, Mobility, Disease Exacerbations, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Quasiexperimental Study.

Bains D, Chahal A, Shaphe M, Kashoo F, Ali T, Alghadir A Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:5528724.

PMID: 35941972 PMC: 9356877. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5528724.


New method for evaluating maximal respiratory pressures: Concurrent validity, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability.

Silveira B, Pereira M, Cardoso D, Ribeiro-Samora G, Martins H, Parreira V Braz J Phys Ther. 2021; 25(6):741-748.

PMID: 34119441 PMC: 8721068. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.04.012.


Correlation and Predicted Equations of MIP/MEP from the Pulmonary Function, Demographics and Anthropometrics in Healthy Thai Participants aged 19 to 50 Years.

Sriboonreung T, Leelarungrayub J, Yankai A, Puntumetakul R Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2021; 15:11795484211004494.

PMID: 33814938 PMC: 7989129. DOI: 10.1177/11795484211004494.


References
1.
Volianitis S, McConnell A, Jones D . Assessment of maximum inspiratory pressure. Prior submaximal respiratory muscle activity ('warm-up') enhances maximum inspiratory activity and attenuates the learning effect of repeated measurement. Respiration. 2001; 68(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1159/000050458. View

2.
Dimitriadis Z, Kapreli E, Konstantinidou I, Oldham J, Strimpakos N . Test/retest reliability of maximum mouth pressure measurements with the MicroRPM in healthy volunteers. Respir Care. 2011; 56(6):776-82. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.00783. View

3.
Larson J, Covey M, Vitalo C, Alex C, Patel M, Kim M . Maximal inspiratory pressure. Learning effect and test-retest reliability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1993; 104(2):448-53. DOI: 10.1378/chest.104.2.448. View

4.
Wilson S, Cooke N, EDWARDS R, Spiro S . Predicted normal values for maximal respiratory pressures in caucasian adults and children. Thorax. 1984; 39(7):535-8. PMC: 459855. DOI: 10.1136/thx.39.7.535. View

5.
Neder J, Andreoni S, Lerario M, Nery L . Reference values for lung function tests. II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999; 32(6):719-27. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x1999000600007. View