» Articles » PMID: 26087130

Soil Penetration by Earthworms and Plant Roots--Mechanical Energetics of Bioturbation of Compacted Soils

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jun 19
PMID 26087130
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We quantify mechanical processes common to soil penetration by earthworms and growing plant roots, including the energetic requirements for soil plastic displacement. The basic mechanical model considers cavity expansion into a plastic wet soil involving wedging by root tips or earthworms via cone-like penetration followed by cavity expansion due to pressurized earthworm hydroskeleton or root radial growth. The mechanical stresses and resulting soil strains determine the mechanical energy required for bioturbation under different soil hydro-mechanical conditions for a realistic range of root/earthworm geometries. Modeling results suggest that higher soil water content and reduced clay content reduce the strain energy required for soil penetration. The critical earthworm or root pressure increases with increased diameter of root or earthworm, however, results are insensitive to the cone apex (shape of the tip). The invested mechanical energy per unit length increase with increasing earthworm and plant root diameters, whereas mechanical energy per unit of displaced soil volume decreases with larger diameters. The study provides a quantitative framework for estimating energy requirements for soil penetration work done by earthworms and plant roots, and delineates intrinsic and external mechanical limits for bioturbation processes. Estimated energy requirements for earthworm biopore networks are linked to consumption of soil organic matter and suggest that earthworm populations are likely to consume a significant fraction of ecosystem net primary production to sustain their subterranean activities.

Citing Articles

Grand challenges for burrowing soft robots.

Le C, Yirmibesoglu O, Even S, Buckner T, Ozkan-Aydin Y, Kramer-Bottiglio R Front Robot AI. 2025; 12:1525186.

PMID: 40018342 PMC: 11864953. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1525186.


A mechanical theory of competition between plant root growth and soil pressure reveals a potential mechanism of root penetration.

Tomobe H, Tsugawa S, Yoshida Y, Arita T, Tsai A, Kubo M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7473.

PMID: 37160914 PMC: 10170176. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34025-x.


An earthworm-like modular soft robot for locomotion in multi-terrain environments.

Das R, Murali Babu S, Visentin F, Palagi S, Mazzolai B Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1571.

PMID: 36709355 PMC: 9884293. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28873-w.


Vegetation and vertebrate abundance as drivers of bioturbation patterns along a climate gradient.

Kraus D, Brandl R, Achilles S, Bendix J, Grigusova P, Larsen A PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0264408.

PMID: 35245302 PMC: 8896722. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264408.


Theoretical evidence that root penetration ability interacts with soil compaction regimes to affect nitrate capture.

Strock C, Rangarajan H, Black C, Schafer E, Lynch J Ann Bot. 2021; 129(3):315-330.

PMID: 34850823 PMC: 8835659. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab144.


References
1.
Murphy E, Dorgan K . Burrow extension with a proboscis: mechanics of burrowing by the glycerid Hemipodus simplex. J Exp Biol. 2011; 214(Pt 6):1017-27. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.051227. View

2.
Greacen E, Oh J . Physics of root growth. Nat New Biol. 1972; 235(53):24-5. DOI: 10.1038/newbio235024a0. View

3.
Dorgan K, Arwade S, Jumars P . Burrowing in marine muds by crack propagation: kinematics and forces. J Exp Biol. 2007; 210(Pt 23):4198-212. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.010371. View

4.
Pritchard J . The control of cell expansion in roots. New Phytol. 2021; 127(1):3-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04255.x. View

5.
Quillin K . Ontogenetic scaling of burrowing forces in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. J Exp Biol. 2000; 203(Pt 18):2757-70. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.18.2757. View