Choice of Commuting Mode Among Employees: Do Home Neighborhood Environment, Worksite Neighborhood Environment, and Worksite Policy and Supports Matter?

Overview

Journal J Transp Health

Publisher Elsevier

Date 2015 Jun 19

PMID 26085979

Citations 11

Authors

Lin Yang

J Aaron Hipp

Deepti Adlakha

Christine M Marx

Rachel G Tabak

Ross C Brownson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Promoting the use of public transit and active transport (walking and cycling) instead of car driving is an appealing strategy to increase overall physical activity.

Purpose: To quantify the combined associations between self-reported home and worksite neighborhood environments, worksite support and policies, and employees' commuting modes.

Method: Between 2012 and 2013, participants residing in four Missouri metropolitan areas were interviewed via telephone (n = 1,338) and provided information on socio-demographic characteristics, home and worksite neighborhoods, and worksite support and policies. Commuting mode was self-reported and categorized into car driving, public transit, and active commuting. Commuting distance was calculated using geographic information systems. Commuters providing completed data were included in the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the correlates of using public transit and active commuting.

Result: The majority of participants reported commuting by driving (88.9%); only 4.9% used public transit and 6.2% used active modes. After multivariate adjustment, having transit stops within 10-15 minutes walking distance from home (p=0.05) and using worksite incentive for public transit (p<0.001) were associated with commuting by public transit. Commuting distance (p<0.001) was negatively associated with active commuting. Having free or low cost recreation facilities around the worksite (p=0.04) and using bike facilities to lock bikes at the worksite (p<0.001) were associated with active commuting.

Conclusion: Both environment features and worksite supports and policies are associated with the choice of commuting mode. Future studies should use longitudinal designs to investigate the potential of promoting alternative commuting modes through worksite efforts that support sustainable commuting behaviors as well as the potential of built environment improvements.

Citing Articles

Walking to work: The role of walkability around the workplace in a Dutch adult commuting population.

Osmenaj T, Lam T, Wagtendonk A, den Braver N SSM Popul Health. 2024; 25:101578.

PMID: 38173691 PMC: 10761905. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101578.

GPS-based activity space exposure to greenness and walkability is associated with increased accelerometer-based physical activity.

Marquet O, Hirsch J, Kerr J, Jankowska M, Mitchell J, Hart J Environ Int. 2022; 165:107317.

PMID: 35660954 PMC: 10187790. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107317.

Commuting to work post-pandemic: Opportunities for health?.

MacLeod K, Cole B, Musselwhite C J Transp Health. 2022; 25:101381.

PMID: 35540370 PMC: 9074865. DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101381.

Workplace neighbourhood built environment and workers' physically-active and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review of observational studies.

Lin C, Koohsari M, Liao Y, Ishii K, Shibata A, Nakaya T Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020; 17(1):148.

PMID: 33218343 PMC: 7678125. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-01055-x.

Daily Walking among Commuters: A Cross-Sectional Study of Associations with Residential, Work, and Regional Accessibility in Melbourne, Australia (2012-2014).

Barr A, Simons K, Mavoa S, Badland H, Giles-Corti B, Scheurer J Environ Health Perspect. 2019; 127(9):97004.

PMID: 31532240 PMC: 6792384. DOI: 10.1289/EHP3395.

References

Panter J, Jones A, van Sluijs E, Griffin S, Wareham N . Environmental and psychological correlates of older adult's active commuting. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 43(7):1235-43. PMC: 3842528. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182078532. View

Hamer M, Chida Y . Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2007; 46(1):9-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.006. View

Hoehner C, Budd E, Marx C, Dodson E, Brownson R . Development and reliability testing of the Worksite and Energy Balance Survey. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013; 19(3 Suppl 1):S105-13. PMC: 4039347. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182849f21. View

Dalton A, Jones A, Panter J, Ogilvie D . Neighbourhood, Route and Workplace-Related Environmental Characteristics Predict Adults' Mode of Travel to Work. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e67575. PMC: 3686740. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067575. View

Rissel C, Curac N, Greenaway M, Bauman A . Physical activity associated with public transport use--a review and modelling of potential benefits. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012; 9(7):2454-78. PMC: 3407915. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9072454. View

Troiano R, Berrigan D, Dodd K, Masse L, Tilert T, McDowell M . Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 40(1):181-8. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3. View

Badland H, Schofield G, Garrett N . Travel behavior and objectively measured urban design variables: associations for adults traveling to work. Health Place. 2007; 14(1):85-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.05.002. View

Zwald M, Hipp J, Corseuil M, Dodson E . Correlates of walking for transportation and use of public transportation among adults in St Louis, Missouri, 2012. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014; 11:E112. PMC: 4082435. DOI: 10.5888/pcd11.140125. View

Yang L, Panter J, Griffin S, Ogilvie D . Associations between active commuting and physical activity in working adults: cross-sectional results from the Commuting and Health in Cambridge study. Prev Med. 2012; 55(5):453-7. PMC: 3863955. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.08.019. View

10.

Brownson R, Boehmer T, Luke D . Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: what are the contributors?. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005; 26:421-43. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144437. View

11.

Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V, Petticrew M . Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. BMJ. 2004; 329(7469):763. PMC: 520994. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55. View

12.

Lusk A, Mekary R, Feskanich D, Willett W . Bicycle riding, walking, and weight gain in premenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(12):1050-6. PMC: 3119355. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.171. View

13.

Sisson S, Tudor-Locke C . Comparison of cyclists' and motorists' utilitarian physical activity at an urban university. Prev Med. 2007; 46(1):77-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.004. View

14.

Knuth A, Hallal P . Temporal trends in physical activity: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6(5):548-59. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.6.5.548. View

15.

Sallis J, Story M, Lou D . Study designs and analytic strategies for environmental and policy research on obesity, physical activity, and diet: recommendations from a meeting of experts. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(2 Suppl):S72-7. PMC: 2694128. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.10.006. View

16.

Kaczynski A, Bopp M, Wittman P . Association of workplace supports with active commuting. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010; 7(6):A127. PMC: 2995592. View

17.

Bray G . Overweight is risking fate. Definition, classification, prevalence, and risks. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987; 499:14-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb36194.x. View

18.

Lachapelle U, Frank L . Transit and health: mode of transport, employer-sponsored public transit pass programs, and physical activity. J Public Health Policy. 2009; 30 Suppl 1:S73-94. DOI: 10.1057/jphp.2008.52. View

19.

Wen L, Kite J, Rissel C . Is there a role for workplaces in reducing employees' driving to work? Findings from a cross-sectional survey from inner-west Sydney, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:50. PMC: 2825221. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-50. View

20.

Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C . Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better?. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15(4):266-97. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00080-4. View