» Articles » PMID: 26083484

Disproportionate Cochlear Length in Genus Homo Shows a High Phylogenetic Signal During Apes' Hearing Evolution

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jun 18
PMID 26083484
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Changes in lifestyles and body weight affected mammal life-history evolution but little is known about how they shaped species' sensory systems. Since auditory sensitivity impacts communication tasks and environmental acoustic awareness, it may have represented a deciding factor during mammal evolution, including apes. Here, we statistically measure the influence of phylogeny and allometry on the variation of five cochlear morphological features associated with hearing capacities across 22 living and 5 fossil catarrhine species. We find high phylogenetic signals for absolute and relative cochlear length only. Comparisons between fossil cochleae and reconstructed ape ancestral morphotypes show that Australopithecus absolute and relative cochlear lengths are explicable by phylogeny and concordant with the hypothetized ((Pan,Homo),Gorilla) and (Pan,Homo) most recent common ancestors. Conversely, deviations of the Paranthropus oval window area from these most recent common ancestors are not explicable by phylogeny and body weight alone, but suggest instead rapid evolutionary changes (directional selection) of its hearing organ. Premodern (Homo erectus) and modern human cochleae set apart from living non-human catarrhines and australopiths. They show cochlear relative lengths and oval window areas larger than expected for their body mass, two features corresponding to increased low-frequency sensitivity more recent than 2 million years ago. The uniqueness of the "hypertrophied" cochlea in the genus Homo (as opposed to the australopiths) and the significantly high phylogenetic signal of this organ among apes indicate its usefulness to identify homologies and monophyletic groups in the hominid fossil record.

Citing Articles

inner ear provides evidence of a common locomotor repertoire ancestral to human bipedalism.

Zhang Y, Ni X, Li Q, Stidham T, Lu D, Gao F Innovation (Camb). 2024; 5(2):100580.

PMID: 38476202 PMC: 10928440. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100580.


First evidence of the link between internal and external structure of the human inner ear otolith system using 3D morphometric modeling.

Smith C, Curthoys I, Laitman J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4840.

PMID: 36964237 PMC: 10039035. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31235-1.


New fossils from Kromdraai and Drimolen, South Africa, and their distinctiveness among Paranthropus robustus.

Braga J, Chinamatira G, Zipfel B, Zimmer V Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13956.

PMID: 35977986 PMC: 9385619. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18223-7.


First Attempt to Infer Sound Hearing and Its Paleoenvironmental Implications in the Extinct Insular Canid Studiati, 1857 (Sardinia, Italy).

Zedda M, Brunetti A, Palombo M Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35405823 PMC: 8996844. DOI: 10.3390/ani12070833.


Hearing loss genes reveal patterns of adaptive evolution at the coding and non-coding levels in mammals.

Trigila A, Pisciottano F, Franchini L BMC Biol. 2021; 19(1):244.

PMID: 34784928 PMC: 8594068. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01170-6.


References
1.
Rook L, Bondioli L, Casali F, Rossi M, Kohler M, Moya Sola S . The bony labyrinth of Oreopithecus bambolii. J Hum Evol. 2004; 46(3):349-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.01.001. View

2.
Anton S, Potts R, Aiello L . Human evolution. Evolution of early Homo: an integrated biological perspective. Science. 2014; 345(6192):1236828. DOI: 10.1126/science.1236828. View

3.
Kamilar J, Cooper N . Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1618):20120341. PMC: 3638444. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0341. View

4.
Coleman M, Boyer D . Inner ear evolution in primates through the Cenozoic: implications for the evolution of hearing. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012; 295(4):615-31. DOI: 10.1002/ar.22422. View

5.
Ruggero M, Temchin A . The roles of the external, middle, and inner ears in determining the bandwidth of hearing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(20):13206-10. PMC: 130611. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.202492699. View