» Articles » PMID: 26081719

Blunt Splenic Injury: Are Early Adverse Events Related to Trauma, Nonoperative Management, or Surgery?

Overview
Date 2015 Jun 18
PMID 26081719
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to compare clinical outcomes and early adverse events of operative management (OM), nonoperative management (NOM), and NOM with splenic artery embolization (SAE) in blunt splenic injury (BSI) and identify the prognostic factors.

Methods: Medical records of 136 consecutive patients with BSI admitted to a trauma center from 2005 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into three groups: OM, NOM, and SAE. We focused on associated injuries and early adverse events. Multivariate analysis was performed on 23 prognostic factors to find predictors.

Results: The total survival rate was 97.1%, with four deaths all occurred in the OM group. The spleen salvage rate was 91% in NOM and SAE. At least one adverse event was observed in 32.8%, 62%, and 96% of patients in NOM, SAE, and OM groups, respectively (P < 0.001). We found significantly more deaths, infectious complications, pleural drainage, acute renal failures, and pancreatitis in OM and more pseudocysts in SAE. Six prognostic factors were statistically significant for one or more adverse events: simplified acute physiology score 2 ≥25 for almost all adverse events, age ≥50 years for acute respiratory syndrome, limb fracture for secondary bleeding, thoracic injury for pleural drainage, and at least one associated injury for pseudocyst. Adverse events were not related to the type of BSI management.

Conclusion: Patients with BSI present worse outcome and more adverse events in OM, but this is related to the severity of injury. The main predictor of adverse events remains the severity of injury.

Citing Articles

Angioembolization in patients with blunt splenic trauma in Germany -guidelines vs. Reality a retrospective registry-based cohort study of the TraumaRegister DGU®.

Kolbel B, Imach S, Engelhardt M, Wafaisade A, Lefering R, Beltzer C Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024; 50(5):2451-2462.

PMID: 39283492 PMC: 11599407. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02640-6.


Pre- and post-implementation protocol for non-operative management of grade III-V splenic injuries: An observational study.

Mahmood I, Younis B, Alabdallat M, Mathradikkal S, Abdelrahman H, El-Menyar A Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28447.

PMID: 38560121 PMC: 10979267. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28447.


Preventive Proximal Splenic Artery Embolization for High-Grade AAST-OIS Adult Spleen Trauma without Vascular Anomaly on the Initial CT Scan: Technical Aspect, Safety, and Efficacy-An Ancillary Study.

Sammoud S, Ghelfi J, Barbois S, Beregi J, Arvieux C, Frandon J J Pers Med. 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37373879 PMC: 10304633. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060889.


Splenic trauma: endovascular treatment approach.

Cretcher M, Panick C, Boscanin A, Farsad K Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(14):1194.

PMID: 34430635 PMC: 8350634. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4381.


Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: Outcomes of Gelfoam Embolization of the Splenic Artery.

Freeman C, Moran V, Fang A, Isreal H, Ma S, Vyas K J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018; 11(4):293-297.

PMID: 30568373 PMC: 6262655. DOI: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_97_17.


References
1.
Dobremez E, Lefevre Y, Harper L, Rebouissoux L, Lavrand F, Bondonny J . Complications occurring during conservative management of splenic trauma in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 16(3):166-70. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-924197. View

2.
Hurtuk M, Reed 2nd R, Esposito T, Davis K, Luchette F . Trauma surgeons practice what they preach: The NTDB story on solid organ injury management. J Trauma. 2006; 61(2):243-54. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000231353.06095.8d. View

3.
Haan J, Marmery H, Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis S, Scalea T . Experience with splenic main coil embolization and significance of new or persistent pseudoaneurym: reembolize, operate, or observe. J Trauma. 2007; 63(3):615-9. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d244. View

4.
Gauer J, Gerber-Paulet S, Seiler C, Schweizer W . Twenty years of splenic preservation in trauma: lower early infection rate than in splenectomy. World J Surg. 2008; 32(12):2730-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9733-3. View

5.
Duchesne J, Simmons J, Schmieg Jr R, McSwain Jr N, Bellows C . Proximal splenic angioembolization does not improve outcomes in treating blunt splenic injuries compared with splenectomy: a cohort analysis. J Trauma. 2008; 65(6):1346-51. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818c29ea. View