» Articles » PMID: 26080757

Enhanced Visual Dominance in Far Space

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Jun 18
PMID 26080757
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Colavita effect refers to the phenomenon that people do not respond to an auditory stimulus in most cases when a visual stimulus is simultaneously presented. Although the Colavita effect remains robust irrespective of many factors, little is known concerning how the visual dominance varies as a function of the depth of sensory inputs. In the present study, visual and auditory stimuli were presented either in the same (in Experiment 1) or in the different spatial distances (in Experiment 2). Participants were asked to make speeded responses to unimodal auditory, unimodal visual, or bimodal audiovisual stimuli. In the incorrectly responded bimodal trials, the error trials in which responses were made only to the visual component were compared with the trials in which responses were made only to the auditory component. In the correctly responded bimodal trials, the trials in which participants responded first to the visual component were compared with the trials in which participants responded first to the auditory component. Analysis on the incorrect and correct bimodal trials both indicated significant visual dominance effects. More importantly, the size of the visual dominance effect was significantly enhanced as long as the visual stimuli were presented in far space irrespective of whether the auditory stimuli were presented in near or far space. Our results thus, for the first time, revealed that the visual dominance effect changed along the depth dimension of space. Taken together, the present results shed lights on how the allocation of attentional resources along the depth dimension of space biases the process of multisensory competition.

Citing Articles

Sound-induced flash illusions at different spatial locations were affected by personality traits.

Zhou H, Li S, Huang J, Yang J, Wang A, Zhang M Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 85(2):463-473.

PMID: 36539573 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02638-5.


Sound-induced flash illusion is modulated by the depth of auditory stimuli: Evidence from younger and older adults.

Sun Y, Zhou H, Liu C, Wang A, Yue C, Zhang M Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(6):2040-2050.

PMID: 35851439 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02537-9.


Close - but not distant - conditioned flanker emotion affects crowding.

Eberhardt L, Pittino F, Huckauf A J Vis. 2021; 21(8):22.

PMID: 34424274 PMC: 8383907. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.8.22.


Endogenous Spatial Attention Modulates the Magnitude of the Colavita Visual Dominance Effect.

Wang A, Zhou H, Hu Y, Wu Q, Zhang T, Tang X Iperception. 2021; 12(4):20416695211027186.

PMID: 34290850 PMC: 8278468. DOI: 10.1177/20416695211027186.


Hand preference for the visual and auditory modalities in humans.

Yang Y, Weiss P, Fink G, Chen Q Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):7868.

PMID: 33846508 PMC: 8041834. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87396-4.


References
1.
Witten I, Knudsen E . Why seeing is believing: merging auditory and visual worlds. Neuron. 2005; 48(3):489-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.020. View

2.
Koppen C, Spence C . Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect. Brain Res. 2007; 1186:224-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.076. View

3.
Plewan T, Weidner R, Fink G . The influence of stimulus duration on visual illusions and simple reaction time. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 223(3):367-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3265-7. View

4.
Ngo M, Cadieux M, Sinnett S, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C . Reversing the Colavita visual dominance effect. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 214(4):607-18. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2859-9. View

5.
Heron J, Whitaker D, McGraw P . Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction. Vision Res. 2004; 44(25):2875-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.001. View