» Articles » PMID: 26079893

Delivery of Crop Pollination Services is an Insufficient Argument for Wild Pollinator Conservation

Abstract

There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.

Citing Articles

Rethinking extinction "crises": The case of Asian songbird trade.

Fiennes S, Hardianto N, Ansari S, Dwiyahreni A, Jackson T, Holmes G Camb Prism Extinct. 2025; 2:e15.

PMID: 40078808 PMC: 11895710. DOI: 10.1017/ext.2024.20.


Understanding interactive effects between habitat configuration and pesticide use for pollination: towards better informed landscape management.

Gebhardt S, van Dijk J, Lof M, Wassen M, Bakker M Ecol Process. 2025; 14(1):25.

PMID: 40045945 PMC: 11876248. DOI: 10.1186/s13717-025-00587-z.


Identification of potential insect ecological interactions using a metabarcoding approach.

Borsato N, Lunn K, Garrett N, Biganzoli-Rangel A, Marquina D, Steinke D PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18906.

PMID: 39981046 PMC: 11841592. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18906.


Increased overwintering temperature reduces reproductive success of the solitary bee species Osmia bicornis.

Muller S, Collatz J, Richter H, Zboray R, Albrecht M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2965.

PMID: 39849078 PMC: 11757717. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86729-x.


Recycling honey bee drone brood for sustainable beekeeping.

Pavlovic R, Crailsheim K, Petrovic M, Goessler W, Zaric N J Econ Entomol. 2025; 118(1):37-44.

PMID: 39786553 PMC: 11818385. DOI: 10.1093/jee/toae303.


References
1.
Balvanera P, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Ricketts T, Bailey S, Kark C . Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Science. 2001; 291(5511):2047. DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5511.2047. View

2.
Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green R . Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science. 2002; 297(5583):950-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1073947. View

3.
Kremen C, Williams N, Thorp R . Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(26):16812-6. PMC: 139226. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.262413599. View

4.
Klein A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T . Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1518):955-61. PMC: 1691323. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2306. View

5.
Ricketts T, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Michener C . Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(34):12579-82. PMC: 515099. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0405147101. View