» Articles » PMID: 26079657

Priorities of Municipal Policy Makers in Relation to Physical Activity and the Built Environment: A Latent Class Analysis

Overview
Date 2015 Jun 17
PMID 26079657
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine policy makers' public policy priorities related to physical activity and the built environment, identify classes of policy makers based on priorities using latent class analysis, and assess factors associated with class membership.

Design: Cross-sectional survey data from municipal officials in 94 cities and towns across 6 US states were analyzed.

Participants: Participants (N = 423) were elected or appointed municipal officials spanning public health, planning, transportation/public works, community and economic development, parks and recreation, and city management.

Main Outcome Measures: Participants rated the importance of 11 policy areas (public health, physical activity, obesity, economic development, livability, climate change, air quality, natural resource conservation, traffic congestion, traffic safety, and needs of vulnerable populations) in their daily job responsibilities. Latent class analysis was used to determine response patterns and identify distinct classes based on officials' priorities. Logistic regression models assessed participant characteristics associated with class membership.

Results: Four classes of officials based on policy priorities emerged: (1) economic development and livability; (2) economic development and traffic concerns; (3) public health; and (4) general (all policy areas rated as highly important). Compared with class 4, officials in classes 1 and 3 were more likely to have a graduate degree, officials in class 2 were less likely to be in a public health job/department, and officials in class 3 were more likely to be in a public health job/department.

Conclusions: Findings can guide public health professionals in framing discussions with policy makers to maximize physical activity potential of public policy initiatives, particularly economic development.

Citing Articles

Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program.

Lemon S, Neptune A, Goulding M, Pendharkar J, Dugger R, Chriqui J Prev Chronic Dis. 2023; 20:E89.

PMID: 37797289 PMC: 10557976. DOI: 10.5888/pcd20.230119.


Modeling the Development of Local Health-Enhancing Physical Activity Policies from Empirical Data and Policy Science Theories.

Racine A, Garbarino J, Massiera B, Vuillemin A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3).

PMID: 35162235 PMC: 8834881. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031213.


Priorities and Indicators for Economic Evaluation of Built Environment Interventions to Promote Physical Activity.

Cradock A, Buchner D, Zaganjor H, Thomas J, Sallis J, Rose K J Phys Act Health. 2021; 18(9):1088-1096.

PMID: 34243168 PMC: 8629833. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0191.


Perceptions of Public Health Priorities and Accountability Among US Mayors.

Godinez Puig L, Lusk K, Glick D, Einstein K, Palmer M, Fox S Public Health Rep. 2020; 136(2):161-171.

PMID: 33108978 PMC: 8093833. DOI: 10.1177/0033354920966050.


Perceptions of barriers and levers of health-enhancing physical activity policies in mid-size French municipalities.

Noel Racine A, Garbarino J, Corrion K, dArripe-Longueville F, Massiera B, Vuillemin A Health Res Policy Syst. 2020; 18(1):62.

PMID: 32513193 PMC: 7278119. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00575-z.


References
1.
Brownson R, Royer C, Ewing R, McBride T . Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30(2):164-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.004. View

2.
Brownson R, Ballew P, Dieffenderfer B, Haire-Joshu D, Heath G, Kreuter M . Evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity: what contributes to dissemination by state health departments. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(1 Suppl):S66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.011. View

3.
Leyden K, Reger-Nash B, Bauman A, Bias T . Changing the hearts and minds of policy makers: an exploratory study associated with the West Virginia Walks campaign. Am J Health Promot. 2008; 22(3):204-7. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.22.3.204. View

4.
Hollander M, Martin S, Vehige T . The surveys are in! The role of local government in supporting active community design. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008; 14(3):228-37. DOI: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000316481.27017.07. View

5.
Thompson A, Boardley D, Kerr D, Greene T, Jenkins M . Public policy involvement by health commissioners. J Community Health. 2009; 34(4):239-45. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-009-9158-4. View