» Articles » PMID: 26067065

The Time Course of Dynamic Computed Tomographic Appearance of Radiation Injury to the Cirrhotic Liver Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jun 13
PMID 26067065
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the dynamic computed tomographic (CT) appearance of focal radiation injury to cirrhotic liver tissue around the tumor following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Seventy-seven patients with 92 HCCs were observed for >6 months. Sixty-four and 13 patients belonged to Child-Pugh class A and B, respectively. The median SBRT dose was 48 Gy/4fr. Dynamic CT scans were performed in non-enhanced, arterial, portal, and venous phases. The median follow-up period was 18 months. Dynamic CT appearances were classified into 3 types: type 1, hyperdensity in all enhanced phases; type 2, hypodensity in arterial and portal phases; type 3, isodensity in all enhanced phases. Half of the type 2 or 3 appearances significantly changed to type 1, particularly in patients belonging to Child-Pugh class A. After 3-6 months, Child-Pugh class B was a significant factor in type 3 patients. Thus, dynamic CT appearances were classified into 3 patterns and significantly changed over time into the enhancement group (type 1) in most patients belonging to Child-Pugh class A. Child-Pugh class B was a significant factor in the non-enhancement group (type 3).

Citing Articles

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Brief Overview.

Matsuo Y Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(2):2493-2500.

PMID: 36826151 PMC: 9956001. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020190.


Evolving development of multi-parametric normal tissue complication probability model for liver radiotherapy.

Tsai C, Cheng J Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 8(Suppl 2):S120-S123.

PMID: 35117079 PMC: 8797564. DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2018.11.25.


Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Sonazoid for Evaluating the Radiotherapy Efficacy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Funaoka A, Numata K, Takeda A, Saigusa Y, Tsurugai Y, Nihonmatsu H Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(3).

PMID: 33803373 PMC: 7998355. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030486.


Surveillance and Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Mehta N, Parikh N, Kelley R, Hameed B, Singal A Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 19(8):1520-1530.

PMID: 32652308 PMC: 7342037. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.072.


Radiotherapy for HCC: Ready for prime time?.

Bang A, Dawson L JHEP Rep. 2020; 1(2):131-137.

PMID: 32039361 PMC: 7001576. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.05.004.


References
1.
Sanuki N, Takeda A, Oku Y, Eriguchi T, Nishimura S, Aoki Y . Threshold doses for focal liver reaction after stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma depend on liver function: evaluation on magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 88(2):306-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.10.045. View

2.
Kimura T, Takahashi S, Kenjo M, Nishibuchi I, Takahashi I, Takeuchi Y . Dynamic computed tomography appearance of tumor response after stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: How should we evaluate treatment effects?. Hepatol Res. 2013; 43(7):717-27. DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12007. View

3.
Willemart S, Nicaise N, Struyven J, Van Gansbeke D . Acute radiation-induced hepatic injury: evaluation by triphasic contrast enhanced helical CT. Br J Radiol. 2000; 73(869):544-6. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.869.10884753. View

4.
Hashimoto K, Murakami T, Dono K, Hori M, Kim T, Kudo M . Assessment of the severity of liver disease and fibrotic change: the usefulness of hepatic CT perfusion imaging. Oncol Rep. 2006; 16(4):677-83. View

5.
Reichen J, Egger B, Ohara N, Zeltner T, Zysset T, Zimmermann A . Determinants of hepatic function in liver cirrhosis in the rat. Multivariate analysis. J Clin Invest. 1988; 82(6):2069-76. PMC: 442790. DOI: 10.1172/JCI113828. View