Microsatellite Analysis of Museum Specimens Reveals Historical Differences in Genetic Diversity Between Declining and More Stable Bombus Species

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2015 Jun 11

PMID 26061732

Citations 7

Authors

Kevin Maebe

Ivan Meeus

Maarten Ganne

Thibaut De Meulemeester

Koos Biesmeijer

Guy Smagghe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Worldwide most pollinators, e.g. bumblebees, are undergoing global declines. Loss of genetic diversity can play an essential role in these observed declines. In this paper, we investigated the level of genetic diversity of seven declining Bombus species and four more stable species with the use of microsatellite loci. Hereto we genotyped a unique collection of museum specimens. Specimens were collected between 1918 and 1926, in 6 provinces of the Netherlands which allowed us to make interspecific comparisons of genetic diversity. For the stable species B. pascuorum, we also selected populations from two additional time periods: 1949-1955 and 1975-1990. The genetic diversity and population structure in B. pascuorum remained constant over the three time periods. However, populations of declining bumblebee species showed a significantly lower genetic diversity than co-occurring stable species before their major declines. This historical difference indicates that the repeatedly observed reduced genetic diversity in recent populations of declining bumblebee species is not caused solely by the decline itself. The historically low genetic diversity in the declined species may be due to the fact that these species were already rare, making them more vulnerable to the major drivers of bumblebee decline.

Citing Articles

Mating frequency estimation and its importance for colony abundance analyses in eusocial pollinators: a case study of Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Bird S, Pope N, McGrady C, Fleischer S, Lopez-Uribe M J Econ Entomol. 2024; 117(5):1712-1722.

PMID: 39137237 PMC: 11646103. DOI: 10.1093/jee/toae178.

High Genetic Diversity and Gene Flow Detected in Populations of Bombus morio from South Brazil.

Beche M, Arnemann J, Silva J, Pozebon H, Valmorbida I, Brondani L Neotrop Entomol. 2022; 51(6):809-820.

PMID: 36315395 DOI: 10.1007/s13744-022-00995-2.

Signals of adaptation to agricultural stress in the genomes of two European bumblebees.

Hart A, Verbeeck J, Ariza D, Cejas D, Ghisbain G, Honchar H Front Genet. 2022; 13:993416.

PMID: 36276969 PMC: 9579324. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.993416.

Level of Genetic Diversity in European Bumblebees is Not Determined by Local Species Abundance.

Maebe K, Karise R, Meeus I, Mand M, Smagghe G Front Genet. 2020; 10:1262.

PMID: 31921301 PMC: 6914865. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01262.

Pattern of population structuring between Belgian and Estonian bumblebees.

Maebe K, Karise R, Meeus I, Mand M, Smagghe G Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):9651.

PMID: 31273269 PMC: 6609714. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46188-7.

References

Schwartz M, Luikart G, Waples R . Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 22(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.009. View

Peakall R, Smouse P . GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(19):2537-9. PMC: 3463245. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460. View

Hansen M, Ruzzante D, Nielsen E, Bekkevold D, Mensberg K . Long-term effective population sizes, temporal stability of genetic composition and potential for local adaptation in anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) populations. Mol Ecol. 2002; 11(12):2523-35. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01634.x. View

Bouzat J, Lewin H, Paige K . The ghost of genetic diversity past: historical DNA analysis of the greater prairie chicken. Am Nat. 2008; 152(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1086/286145. View

Estoup A, Solignac M, Harry M, Cornuet J . Characterization of (GT)n and (CT)n microsatellites in two insect species: Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993; 21(6):1427-31. PMC: 309328. DOI: 10.1093/nar/21.6.1427. View

Goulson D, Lye G, Darvill B . Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007; 53:191-208. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454. View

Chapuis M, Lecoq M, Michalakis Y, Loiseau A, Sword G, Piry S . Do outbreaks affect genetic population structure? A worldwide survey in Locusta migratoria, a pest plagued by microsatellite null alleles. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17(16):3640-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03869.x. View

Pertoldi C, Hansen M, Loeschcke V, Madsen A, Jacobsen L, Baagoe H . Genetic consequences of population decline in the European otter (Lutra lutra): an assessment of microsatellite DNA variation in Danish otters from 1883 to 1993. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1478):1775-81. PMC: 1088808. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1762. View

Jost L . G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol. 2009; 17(18):4015-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03887.x. View

10.

Darvill B, Ellis J, Lye G, Goulson D . Population structure and inbreeding in a rare and declining bumblebee, Bombus muscorum (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mol Ecol. 2006; 15(3):601-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02797.x. View

11.

Chapuis M, Estoup A . Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol. 2006; 24(3):621-31. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl191. View

12.

Ashley M, Caballero I, Chaovalitwongse W, Dasgupta B, Govindan P, Sheikh S . KINALYZER, a computer program for reconstructing sibling groups. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011; 9(4):1127-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02562.x. View

13.

Heath D, Busch C, Kelly J, Atagi D . Temporal change in genetic structure and effective population size in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mol Ecol. 2002; 11(2):197-214. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01434.x. View

14.

Biesmeijer J, Roberts S, Reemer M, Ohlemuller R, Edwards M, Peeters T . Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science. 2006; 313(5785):351-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1127863. View

15.

Miller C, Waits L . The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): implications for conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(7):4334-9. PMC: 153093. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0735531100. View

16.

Nei M . Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978; 89(3):583-90. PMC: 1213855. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583. View

17.

Cameron S, Lozier J, Strange J, Koch J, Cordes N, Solter L . Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(2):662-7. PMC: 3021065. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014743108. View

18.

Charman T, Sears J, Green R, Bourke A . Conservation genetics, foraging distance and nest density of the scarce Great Yellow Bumblebee (Bombus distinguendus). Mol Ecol. 2010; 19(13):2661-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04697.x. View

19.

Leonard J . Ancient DNA applications for wildlife conservation. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17(19):4186-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03891.x. View

20.

Kraus F, Wolf S, Moritz R . Male flight distance and population substructure in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. J Anim Ecol. 2009; 78(1):247-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01479.x. View