» Articles » PMID: 26053004

A Systematic Review of Interventions Addressing Adherence to Anti-Diabetic Medications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes--Components of Interventions

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Jun 9
PMID 26053004
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Poor adherence to anti-diabetic medications contributes to suboptimal glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A range of interventions have been developed to promote anti-diabetic medication adherence. However, there has been very little focus on the characteristics of these interventions and how effectively they address factors that predict non-adherence. In this systematic review we assessed the characteristics of interventions that aimed to promote adherence to anti-diabetic medications.

Method: Using appropriate search terms in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), PUBmed, and PsychINFO (years 2000-2013), we identified 52 studies which met the inclusion criteria.

Results: Forty-nine studies consisted of patient-level interventions, two provider-level interventions, and one consisted of both. Interventions were classified as educational (n = 7), behavioural (n = 3), affective, economic (n = 3) or multifaceted (a combination of the above; n = 40). One study consisted of two interventions. The review found that multifaceted interventions, addressing several non-adherence factors, were comparatively more effective in improving medication adherence and glycaemic target in patients with T2D than single strategies. However, interventions with similar components and those addressing similar non-adherence factors demonstrated mixed results, making it difficult to conclude on effective intervention strategies to promote adherence. Educational strategies have remained the most popular intervention strategy, followed by behavioural, with affective components becoming more common in recent years. Most of the interventions addressed patient-related (n = 35), condition-related (n = 31), and therapy-related (n = 20) factors as defined by the World Health Organization, while fewer addressed health care system (n = 5) and socio-economic-related factors (n = 13).

Conclusion: There is a noticeable shift in the literature from using single to multifaceted intervention strategies addressing a range of factors impacting adherence to medications. However, research limitations, such as limited use of standardized methods and tools to measure adherence, lack of individually tailored adherence promoting strategies and variability in the interventions developed, reduce the ability to generalize the findings of the studies reviewed. Furthermore, this review highlights the need to develop multifaceted interventions which can be tailored to the individual patient's needs over the duration of their diabetes management.

Citing Articles

Impact of Interventions on Medication Adherence in Patients With Coexisting Diabetes and Hypertension.

Maniki P, Chaar B, Aslani P Health Expect. 2024; 27(5):e70010.

PMID: 39248043 PMC: 11381960. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70010.


A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Medication-Taking Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Vallis M, Jin S, Klimek-Abercrombie A, Ng G, Ivers N Diabetes Spectr. 2024; 37(3):264-272.

PMID: 39157784 PMC: 11327164. DOI: 10.2337/ds23-0038.


The Use of Podcasts as Patient Preparation for Hospital Visits-An Interview Study Exploring Patients' Experiences.

Frolund J, Lokke A, Jensen H, Farver-Vestergaard I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(6).

PMID: 38928992 PMC: 11203501. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21060746.


Exploring the use of self-management strategies for antiretroviral therapy adherence among women with HIV in the Miami-Dade County Ryan White Program.

Gray A, Ward M, Fernandez S, Nawfal E, Gwanzura T, Li T J Behav Med. 2023; 47(2):282-294.

PMID: 37946027 PMC: 10947905. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-023-00459-x.


Interventions to promote medication adherence for chronic diseases in India: a systematic review.

Tolley A, Hassan R, Sanghera R, Grewal K, Kong R, Sodhi B Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1194919.

PMID: 37397765 PMC: 10311913. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1194919.


References
1.
Kim H, Kim N, Ahn S . Impact of a nurse short message service intervention for patients with diabetes. J Nurs Care Qual. 2006; 21(3):266-71. DOI: 10.1097/00001786-200607000-00012. View

2.
Barnard K, Peyrot M, Holt R . Psychosocial support for people with diabetes: past, present and future. Diabet Med. 2012; 29(11):1358-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03727.x. View

3.
Maddigan S, Majumdar S, Guirguis L, Lewanczuk R, Lee T, Toth E . Improvements in patient-reported outcomes associated with an intervention to enhance quality of care for rural patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(6):1306-12. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1306. View

4.
Briesacher B, Andrade S, Fouayzi H, Chan K . Comparison of drug adherence rates among patients with seven different medical conditions. Pharmacotherapy. 2008; 28(4):437-43. PMC: 2737273. DOI: 10.1592/phco.28.4.437. View

5.
Thoolen B, Ridder D, Bensing J, Gorter K, Rutten G . Beyond good intentions: The role of proactive coping in achieving sustained behavioural change in the context of diabetes management. Psychol Health. 2010; 24(3):237-54. DOI: 10.1080/08870440701864504. View