» Articles » PMID: 26052805

Traumatic Brain Injury Caregivers: A Qualitative Analysis of Spouse and Parent Perspectives on Quality of Life

Overview
Date 2015 Jun 9
PMID 26052805
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this qualitative study was to examine how family caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) describe their quality of life in the context of their caregiving role. Fifty-two caregivers of adults with moderate or severe TBI (n = 31 parents, n = 21 partners/spouses; 77% female; mean age = 57.96 years, range = 34-78 years) were recruited from three data collection sites to participate in focus groups. Thematic content analysis was used to identify two main meta-themes: Caregiver Role Demands and Changes in Person with TBI. Prominent sub-themes indicated that caregivers are (1) overburdened with responsibilities, (2) lack personal time and time for self-care, (3) feel that their life is interrupted or lost, (4) grieve the loss of the person with TBI, and (5) endorse anger, guilt, anxiety, and sadness. Caregivers identified a number of service needs. A number of sub-themes were perceived differently by partner versus parent caregivers. The day-to-day responsibilities of being a caregiver as well as the changes in the person with the TBI present a variety of challenges and sources of distress for caregivers. Although services that address instrumental as well as emotional needs of caregivers may benefit caregivers in general, the service needs of parent and partner caregivers may differ.

Citing Articles

Family member reported symptom burden, predictors of caregiver burden and treatment effects in a goal-oriented community-based randomized controlled trial in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injury.

Lovstad M, Borgen I, Hauger S, Kleffelgard I, Brunborg C, Roe C BMC Neurol. 2024; 24(1):333.

PMID: 39256658 PMC: 11386120. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03841-7.


Striving to Limit the Impact: Parenting an Adult Child Who Has Multiple Sclerosis-A Grounded Theory Study.

Holden C, Hewitt P, Tams R Int J MS Care. 2023; 25(6):259-265.

PMID: 37969912 PMC: 10634593. DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-053.


Psychometric properties of the caregiving difficulty scale in mothers of children with cerebral palsy.

Park E BMC Neurol. 2023; 23(1):237.

PMID: 37340392 PMC: 10280876. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03264-w.


Successful Community Discharge Among Older Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities.

Evans E, Gutman R, Resnik L, Krebill C, Lueckel S, Zonfrillo M Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022; 4(4):100241.

PMID: 36545522 PMC: 9761303. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100241.


A moderated-mediation analysis of pathways in the association between Veterans' health and their spouse's relationship satisfaction: The importance of social support.

Frank C, Coulthard J, Lee J, Skomorovsky A Front Psychol. 2022; 13:988814.

PMID: 36405134 PMC: 9666880. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988814.


References
1.
Nabors N, Seacat J, Rosenthal M . Predictors of caregiver burden following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2002; 16(12):1039-50. DOI: 10.1080/02699050210155285. View

2.
Ergh T, Hanks R, Rapport L, Coleman R . Social support moderates caregiver life satisfaction following traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003; 25(8):1090-101. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.25.8.1090.16735. View

3.
Smith A, Schwirian P . The relationship between caregiver burden and TBI survivors' cognition and functional ability after discharge. Rehabil Nurs. 1999; 23(5):252-7. DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1998.tb01795.x. View

4.
Florian V, Katz S, Lahav V . Impact of traumatic brain damage on family dynamics and functioning: a review. Brain Inj. 1989; 3(3):219-33. DOI: 10.3109/02699058909029637. View

5.
Sander A, Maestas K, Sherer M, Malec J, Nakase-Richardson R . Relationship of caregiver and family functioning to participation outcomes after postacute rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a multicenter investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93(5):842-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.031. View