» Articles » PMID: 26052300

The Role of the Positive Emotional Attractor in Vision and Shared Vision: Toward Effective Leadership, Relationships, and Engagement

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2015 Jun 9
PMID 26052300
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Personal and shared vision have a long history in management and organizational practices yet only recently have we begun to build a systematic body of empirical knowledge about the role of personal and shared vision in organizations. As the introductory paper for this special topic in Frontiers in Psychology, we present a theoretical argument as to the existence and critical role of two states in which a person, dyad, team, or organization may find themselves when engaging in the creation of a personal or shared vision: the positive emotional attractor (PEA) and the negative emotional attractor (NEA). These two primary states are strange attractors, each characterized by three dimensions: (1) positive versus negative emotional arousal; (2) endocrine arousal of the parasympathetic nervous system versus sympathetic nervous system; and (3) neurological activation of the default mode network versus the task positive network. We argue that arousing the PEA is critical when creating or affirming a personal vision (i.e., sense of one's purpose and ideal self). We begin our paper by reviewing the underpinnings of our PEA-NEA theory, briefly review each of the papers in this special issue, and conclude by discussing the practical implications of the theory.

Citing Articles

Translating purpose and mindset into positive impact through shared vision, compassion, and energy-a comparative study of seven organizations.

Leah J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1251256.

PMID: 38333063 PMC: 10850337. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1251256.


When fixing problems kills personal development: fMRI reveals conflict between Real and Ideal selves.

Jack A, Passarelli A, Boyatzis R Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1128209.

PMID: 37600554 PMC: 10435861. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1128209.


From Coaching to Neurocoaching: A Neuroscientific Approach during a Coaching Session to Assess the Relational Dynamics between Coach and Coachee-A Pilot Study.

Valesi R, Gabrielli G, Zito M, Bellati M, Bilucaglia M, Caponetto A Behav Sci (Basel). 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37504044 PMC: 10376351. DOI: 10.3390/bs13070596.


The role of empathy in shared intentionality: Contributions from Inter-Processual Self theory.

Luis E, Martinez M, Akrivou K, Scalzo G, Aoiz M, Oron Semper J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1079950.

PMID: 36968699 PMC: 10036387. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1079950.


Emerging Frontline Leaders' Voices in Response to COVID-19 Crisis.

Taha A, Zhang Z, Driessnack M, Huntzicker J, Eisen A, Bernstein J Nurs Res. 2021; 71(2):104-110.

PMID: 34967828 PMC: 8881397. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000571.


References
1.
Buse K, Bilimoria D . Personal vision: enhancing work engagement and the retention of women in the engineering profession. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1400. PMC: 4259005. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01400. View

2.
Higgins E, Roney C, Crowe E, HYMES C . Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66(2):276-86. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.276. View

3.
Schilbach L, Eickhoff S, Rotarska-Jagiela A, Fink G, Vogeley K . Minds at rest? Social cognition as the default mode of cognizing and its putative relationship to the "default system" of the brain. Conscious Cogn. 2008; 17(2):457-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013. View

4.
Insel T . A neurobiological basis of social attachment. Am J Psychiatry. 1997; 154(6):726-35. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.154.6.726. View

5.
Seligman M, Railton P, Baumeister R, Sripada C . Navigating Into the Future or Driven by the Past. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 8(2):119-41. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612474317. View