» Articles » PMID: 26028965

Impact of JAK2(V617F) Mutation Status on Treatment Response to Anagrelide in Essential Thrombocythemia: an Observational, Hypothesis-generating Study

Abstract

A JAK2(V617F) mutation is found in approximately 55% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), and represents a key World Health Organization diagnostic criterion. This hypothesis-generating study (NCT01352585) explored the impact of JAK2(V617F) mutation status on treatment response to anagrelide in patients with ET who were intolerant/refractory to their current cytoreductive therapy. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of JAK2-positive versus JAK2-negative patients who achieved at least a partial platelet response (≤600×10(9)/L) after anagrelide therapy. Of the 47 patients enrolled, 46 were included in the full analysis set (JAK2-positive, n=22; JAK2-negative, n=24). At 12 months, 35 patients (n=14 and n=21, respectively) had a suitable platelet sample; of these, 74.3% (n=26) achieved at least a partial response. The response rate was higher in JAK2-positive (85.7%, n=12) versus JAK2-negative patients (66.7%, n=14) (odds ratio [OR] 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44, 33.97). By using the last observation carried forward approach in the sensitivity analysis, which considered the imbalance in patients with suitable samples between groups, the overall response rate was 71.7% (n=33/46), with 77.3% (n=17/22) of JAK2-positive and 66.7% (n=16/24) of JAK2-negative patients achieving at least a partial response (OR 1.70; 95% CI 0.39, 8.02). There was no significant change in median allele burden over 12 months in the 12 patients who achieved a response. In conclusion, the overall platelet response rate was high in both JAK2-positive and JAK2-negative patients; however, a larger study would be required to confirm the differences observed according to JAK2(V617F) mutation status.

Citing Articles

A multicenter, open-label study for efficacy and safety evaluation of anagrelide in patients with treatment-naïve, high-risk essential thrombocythemia as a primary treatment.

Byun J, Kim H, Nam S, Shin H, Song S, Park J Front Oncol. 2022; 12:989984.

PMID: 36505839 PMC: 9727180. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.989984.


A case of JAK2V617F-positive essential thrombocythemia where allele burden was reduced by a PD-1 inhibitor.

Hara R, Kawada H, Kikuti Y, Kikkawa E, Harada K, Aoyama Y Int J Hematol. 2021; 113(4):606-610.

PMID: 33389657 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-020-03046-x.


The Use of Anagrelide in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, with Focus on Essential Thrombocythemia.

Birgegard G Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016; 11(5):348-55.

PMID: 27497846 PMC: 5031713. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-016-0335-0.

References
1.
Rotunno G, Mannarelli C, Guglielmelli P, Pacilli A, Pancrazzi A, Pieri L . Impact of calreticulin mutations on clinical and hematological phenotype and outcome in essential thrombocythemia. Blood. 2013; 123(10):1552-5. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-538983. View

2.
Barbui T, Barosi G, Grossi A, Gugliotta L, Liberato L, Marchetti M . Practice guidelines for the therapy of essential thrombocythemia. A statement from the Italian Society of Hematology, the Italian Society of Experimental Hematology and the Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. Haematologica. 2004; 89(2):215-32. View

3.
Birgegard G, Bjorkholm M, Kutti J, Larfars G, Lofvenberg E, Markevarn B . Adverse effects and benefits of two years of anagrelide treatment for thrombocythemia in chronic myeloproliferative disorders. Haematologica. 2004; 89(5):520-7. View

4.
Fruchtman S, Petitt R, Gilbert H, Fiddler G, Lyne A . Anagrelide: analysis of long-term efficacy, safety and leukemogenic potential in myeloproliferative disorders. Leuk Res. 2005; 29(5):481-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2004.10.002. View

5.
Baxter E, Scott L, Campbell P, East C, Fourouclas N, Swanton S . Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet. 2005; 365(9464):1054-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71142-9. View