Carboxylesterase 2 As a Determinant of Response to Irinotecan and Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Serine hydrolases (SHs) are among the largest classes of enzymes in humans and play crucial role in many pathophysiological processes of cancer. We have undertaken a comprehensive proteomic analysis to assess the differential expression and cellular localization of SHs, which uncovered distinctive expression of Carboxylesterase 2 (CES2), the most efficient carboxyl esterase in activating the prodrug irinotecan into SN-38, in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We therefore assessed the extent of heterogeneity in CES2 expression in PDAC and its potential relevance to irinotecan based therapy.
Methods: CES2 expression in PDAC and paired nontumor tissues was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. CES2 activity was assessed by monitoring the hydrolysis of the substrate p-NPA and correlated with irinotecan IC50 values by means of Pearson's correlation. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were applied to assess the association between overall survival and CES2 expression in patients who underwent neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: Statistically significant overexpression of CES2, both at the mRNA and protein levels, was observed in PDAC compared with paired nontumor tissue (P < .001), with 48 of 118 (40.7%) tumors exhibiting high CES2 expression. CES2 activity in 11 PDAC cell lines was inversely correlated with irinotecan IC50 values (R = -0.68, P = .02). High CES2 expression in tumor tissue was associated with longer overall survival in resectable and borderline resectable patients who underwent neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment (hazard ratio = 0.14, 95% confidence interval = 0.04 to 0.51, P = .02).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CES2 expression and activity, by mediating the intratumoral activation of irinotecan, is a contributor to FOLFIRINOX sensitivity in pancreatic cancer and CES2 assessment may define a subset of patients likely to respond to irinotecan based therapy.
Chen Q, Hao Q, Yang Y, Li L, Li D, Zhao R Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025; 24:15330338251319144.
PMID: 39912257 PMC: 11800256. DOI: 10.1177/15330338251319144.
Kluz N, Kraj L, Chmiel P, Przybylkowski A, Wyrwicz L, Stec R Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).
PMID: 39682132 PMC: 11640600. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16233945.
Wang Y, Gan C, Beukers-Korver J, Rosing H, Li W, Wagenaar E Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2024; 46(3):777-793.
PMID: 39496863 PMC: 11845761. DOI: 10.1038/s41401-024-01407-4.
An J, Kurilov R, Peccerella T, Bergmann F, Edderkaoui M, Lim A Transl Oncol. 2024; 49:102109.
PMID: 39217851 PMC: 11402625. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102109.
Jung J, Schneider E, Zhang W, Song H, Zhang M, Chou W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14175.
PMID: 38898077 PMC: 11187204. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64186-2.