Electroanatomical Voltage and Morphology Characteristics in Postinfarction Patients Undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Pragmatic Approach Favoring Late Potentials Abolition
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Catheter ablation is an important therapeutic option in postmyocardial infarction patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). We analyzed the endo-epicardial electroanatomical mapping (EAM) voltage and morphology characteristics, their association with clinical data and their prognostic value in a large cohort of postmyocardial infarction patients.
Methods And Results: We performed total and segmental analysis of voltage (bipolar dense scar [DS] and low voltage areas, unipolar low voltage and penumbra areas) and morphology characteristics (presence of abnormal late potentials [LPs] and early potentials [EPs]) in 100 postmyocardial infarction patients undergoing electroanatomical mapping-based VT ablation (26 endo-epicardial procedures) from 2010-2012. All patients had unipolar low voltage areas, whereas 18% had no identifiable endocardial bipolar DS areas. Endocardial bipolar DS area >22.5 cm(2) best predicted scar transmurality. Endo-epicardial LPs were recorded in 2/3 patients, more frequently in nonseptal myocardial segments and were abolished in 51%. Endocardial bipolar DS area >7 cm(2) and endocardial bipolar scar density >0.35 predicted epicardial LPs. Isolated LPs are located mainly epicardially and EPs endocardially. As a primary strategy, LPs and VT-mapping ablation occurred in 48%, only VT-mapping ablation in 27%, only LPs ablation in 17%, and EPs ablation in 6%. Endocardial LP abolition was associated with reduced VT recurrence and increased unipolar penumbra area predicted cardiac death.
Conclusions: Endocardial scar extension and density predict scar transmurality and endo-epicardial presence of LPs, although DS is not always identified in postmyocardial infarction patients. LPs, most frequently located in nonseptal myocardial segments, were abolished in 51% resulting in improved outcome.
de Riva M, Evertz R, Lukac P, Dekker L, Blaauw Y, Ter Bekke R Europace. 2025; 27(2).
PMID: 39992165 PMC: 11848844. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaf003.
Roukoz H, Tholakanahalli V Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2024; 24(2):84-93.
PMID: 38340957 PMC: 11010455. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2024.02.002.
Computer-aided detection of arrhythmogenic sites in post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia.
Baldazzi G, Orru M, Viola G, Pani D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6906.
PMID: 37106017 PMC: 10140038. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33866-w.
Substrate-based approaches in ventricular tachycardia ablation.
Hawson J, Al-Kaisey A, Anderson R, Watts T, Morton J, Kumar S Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2022; 22(6):273-285.
PMID: 36007824 PMC: 9649336. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2022.08.002.
Schleberger R, Riess J, Brauer A, Pinnschmidt H, Rottner L, Moser F Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:910042.
PMID: 35694678 PMC: 9174508. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.910042.