» Articles » PMID: 26018091

Is the Swedish FRAX Model Appropriate for Swedish Immigrants?

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2015 May 29
PMID 26018091
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The incidence of hip fracture in Sweden is substantially lower in immigrants than in the population born in Sweden. Thus, the use of a FRAX® model in immigrants overestimates the risk of fracture, and the use of country of origin-specific models may be more appropriate.

Introduction: Age-specific fracture and mortality rates vary between countries so that FRAX tools are country-specific. In the case of immigrants, it is not known whether the model for the original or the new country is most appropriate. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of hip fractures in foreign-born and Swedish-born individuals residing in Sweden.

Methods: We studied the incidence of hip fracture in all men and women aged 50 years or more in Sweden between 1987 and 2002. The population comprised 2.8 million Swedish-born and 270,000 foreign-born individuals.

Results: Incident hip fractures occurred in 239,842 Swedish-born and 12,563 foreign-born individuals. The hip fracture incidence rose with age for both groups and was higher for women than men amongst both Swedish-born and foreign-born individuals. The hip fracture incidence for the Swedish-born cohort was approximately twice that of immigrants. For example, at the age of 70 years, the annual hip fracture incidence (per 100,000) was 450 (95 % CI 446-454) for a Swedish-born woman and 239 (95 % CI 223-257) for a foreign-born woman at the time of immigration. The hip fracture incidence rose slowly with time from immigration (0.6 % per annum, 95 % CI 0.5-0.8 %) but remained significantly lower than for Swedish-born individuals even after 40 years of residence.

Conclusions: The incidence of hip fracture in Sweden is substantially lower in immigrants than in the population native to Sweden. Although there was a small rise in age- and sex-specific incidence after immigration, the incidence remained markedly lower than that observed in Swedish-born individuals. Thus, the use of a FRAX model for Sweden will overestimate the risk of fracture for foreign-born individuals living in Sweden.

Citing Articles

Fracture Risk Assessment in Metabolic Syndrome in Terms of Secondary Osteoporosis Potential. A Narrative Review.

Armutcu F, McCloskey E Calcif Tissue Int. 2025; 116(1):41.

PMID: 39979438 PMC: 11842537. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-025-01341-5.


[Osteoporosis-Definition, risk assessment, diagnosis, prevention and treatment (update 2024) : Guidelines of the Austrian Society for Bone and Mineral Research].

Dimai H, Muschitz C, Amrein K, Bauer R, Cejka D, Gasser R Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024; 136(Suppl 16):599-668.

PMID: 39356323 PMC: 11447007. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-024-02441-2.


Subsequent fracture risk in Norwegians and immigrants with an index forearm fracture: a cohort study.

Semsarian S, Omsland T, Heen E, Madar A, Frihagen F, Gjertsen J Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):72.

PMID: 39107458 PMC: 11303429. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01419-x.


Race-specific FRAX models are evidence-based and support equitable care: a response to the ASBMR Task Force report on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk.

Kanis J, Harvey N, Lorentzon M, Liu E, Schini M, Abrahamsen B Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(9):1487-1496.

PMID: 38960982 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07162-w.


The hip fracture incidence in the high-risk area Oslo continues to decline.

Hestnes I, Solberg L, Meyer H, Sundet M, Rimal R, Nordsletten L Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(9):1615-1623.

PMID: 38922398 PMC: 11364682. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07156-8.


References
1.
Leslie W, Brennan S, Lix L, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E . Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women. Arch Osteoporos. 2013; 8:145. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0145-0. View

2.
Ross P, Huang C . Hip fracture incidence among Caucasians in Hawaii is similar to Japanese. A population-based study. Aging (Milano). 2000; 12(5):356-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF03339860. View

3.
Kanis J, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby A . International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17(7):1237-44. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.7.1237. View

4.
Kanis J, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J . European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 24(1):23-57. PMC: 3587294. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y. View

5.
Holvik K, Meyer H, Haug E, Brunvand L . Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D deficiency in five immigrant groups living in Oslo, Norway: the Oslo Immigrant Health Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 59(1):57-63. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602033. View