» Articles » PMID: 26017273

Delay and Probability Discounting of Sexual and Monetary Outcomes in Individuals with Cocaine Use Disorders and Matched Controls

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 May 29
PMID 26017273
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individuals with cocaine use disorders are disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS, partly due to higher rates of unprotected sex. Recent research suggests delay discounting of condom use is a factor in sexual HIV risk. Delay discounting is a behavioral economic concept describing how delaying an event reduces that event's value or impact on behavior. Probability discounting is a related concept describing how the uncertainty of an event decreases its impact on behavior. Individuals with cocaine use disorders (n = 23) and matched non-cocaine-using controls (n = 24) were compared in decision-making tasks involving hypothetical outcomes: delay discounting of condom-protected sex (Sexual Delay Discounting Task), delay discounting of money, the effect of sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk on likelihood of condom use (Sexual Probability Discounting Task), and probability discounting of money. The Cocaine group discounted delayed condom-protected sex (i.e., were more likely to have unprotected sex vs. wait for a condom) significantly more than controls in two of four Sexual Delay Discounting Task partner conditions. The Cocaine group also discounted delayed money (i.e., preferred smaller immediate amounts over larger delayed amounts) significantly more than controls. In the Sexual Probability Discounting Task, both groups showed sensitivity to STI risk, however the groups did not differ. The Cocaine group did not consistently discount probabilistic money more or less than controls. Steeper discounting of delayed, but not probabilistic, sexual outcomes may contribute to greater rates of sexual HIV risk among individuals with cocaine use disorders. Probability discounting of sexual outcomes may contribute to risk of unprotected sex in both groups. Correlations showed sexual and monetary results were unrelated, for both delay and probability discounting. The results highlight the importance of studying specific behavioral processes (e.g., delay and probability discounting) with respect to specific outcomes (e.g., monetary and sexual) to understand decision making in problematic behavior.

Citing Articles

The Use of Nonmonetary Outcomes in Health-Related Delay Discounting Research: Review and Recommendations.

Rasmussen E, Camp L, Lawyer S Perspect Behav Sci. 2024; 47(2):523-558.

PMID: 39099748 PMC: 11294320. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-024-00403-7.


Recent Experience Affects Delay Discounting: Evidence across Temporal Framing, Signs, and Magnitudes.

Willis-Moore M, Haynes J, Frye C, Johnson H, Cousins D, Bamfo H Perspect Behav Sci. 2024; 47(2):365-392.

PMID: 39099743 PMC: 11294302. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-024-00412-6.


Designing and Validating a Novel Method for Assessing Delay Discounting Associated With Health Behaviors: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Luken A, Rabinowitz J, Wells J, Sosnowski D, Strickland J, Thrul J JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e48954.

PMID: 38412027 PMC: 10933719. DOI: 10.2196/48954.


Delay discounting of protected sex and compulsive sexual behavior in women with borderline personality disorder.

Finkenstaedt M, Biedermann D, Schroder J, Mazinan R, Fuss J, Biedermann S J Behav Addict. 2024; 13(1):250-261.

PMID: 38329531 PMC: 10988410. DOI: 10.1556/2006.2024.00003.


Sexual Arousal-Delay Discounting: When Condoms Delay Arousal.

Gebru N, Wongsomboon V J Sex Res. 2023; 61(5):727-741.

PMID: 37506314 PMC: 10822021. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2239216.


References
1.
Strathdee S, Sherman S . The role of sexual transmission of HIV infection among injection and non-injection drug users. J Urban Health. 2004; 80(4 Suppl 3):iii7-14. PMC: 3456264. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jtg078. View

2.
Green L, Myerson J, Ostaszewski P . Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999; 25(2):418-27. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.2.418. View

3.
Ohmura Y, Takahashi T, Kitamura N . Discounting delayed and probabilistic monetary gains and losses by smokers of cigarettes. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005; 182(4):508-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0110-8. View

4.
Axon R, Bradford W, Egan B . The role of individual time preferences in health behaviors among hypertensive adults: a pilot study. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2010; 3(1):35-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2008.08.005. View

5.
Myerson J, Green L, Warusawitharana M . Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001; 76(2):235-43. PMC: 1284836. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235. View