» Articles » PMID: 26017056

Influence of Socio-economic Status on Access to Different Components of SCI Management Across Indian Population

Overview
Journal Spinal Cord
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 May 29
PMID 26017056
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the influence of financial constraints on access to different components of spinal cord injury (SCI) management in various socio-economic strata of the Indian population.

Setting: Indian Spinal Injuries Centre (ISIC).

Methods: One hundred fifty SCI individuals who came for follow-up at ISIC between March 2009 and March 2013 with at least 1 year of community exposure after discharge were included in the study. Socio-economic classification was carried out according to the Kuppuswamy scale, a standard scale for the Indian population. A self-designed questionnaire was administered.

Results: No sample was available from the lower group. There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) for the levels of difficulty perceived by different socio-economic groups in accessing different components of SCI management. Aided upper lower group was dependent on welfare schemes for in-hospital treatment but could not access other components of management once discharged. Unaided upper lower group either faced severe difficulty or could not access management. Majority of lower middle group faced severe difficulty. Upper middle group was equally divided into facing severe, moderate or no difficulty. Most patients in the upper group faced no difficulty, whereas some faced moderate and a small number of severe difficulty.

Conclusion: Financial constraints affected all components of SCI management in all except the upper group. The results of the survey suggest that a very large percentage of the Indian population would find it difficult to access comprehensive SCI management and advocate extension of essential medical coverage to unaided upper lower, lower middle and upper middle groups.

Citing Articles

Impact of Patient Counseling and Socioeconomic Factors on Initiation of Rehabilitation Program in Spinal Cord Injury Patients Presenting to a Tertiary Spine Unit in India.

Aiyer S, Gunasekaran V, Mani L, Anand K S S, Rajasekaran S, Shetty A Asian Spine J. 2020; 15(3):357-364.

PMID: 32872761 PMC: 8217846. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0008.


Rising to the Challenge: Spinal Ailments in India.

Chhabra H Indian J Orthop. 2019; 53(4):489-492.

PMID: 31303663 PMC: 6590018. DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_294_19.


Clinical proteomics of enervated neurons.

Sengupta M, Chakrabarti A, Saha S, Mukhopadhyay D Clin Proteomics. 2016; 13:10.

PMID: 27152104 PMC: 4857373. DOI: 10.1186/s12014-016-9112-2.

References
1.
Sharma R, Saini N . A Critical Appraisal of Kuppuswamy's Socioeconomic Status Scale in the Present Scenario. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014; 3(1):3-4. PMC: 4005197. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.130248. View

2.
DeVivo M, Kartus P, Stover S, Fine P . Benefits of early admission to an organised spinal cord injury care system. Paraplegia. 1990; 28(9):545-55. DOI: 10.1038/sc.1990.74. View

3.
Priebe M, Chiodo A, Scelza W, Kirshblum S, Wuermser L, Ho C . Spinal cord injury medicine. 6. Economic and societal issues in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(3 Suppl 1):S84-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.005. View

4.
Raminashvili D, Gvanceladze T, Kajrishvili M, Zarnadze I, Zarnadze S . Social environment, bases social markers and health care system in Shida Kartli region. Georgian Med News. 2009; (175):68-70. View

5.
Kumar H, Gupta N . Neurological disorders and barriers for neurological rehabilitation in rural areas in Uttar Pradesh: A cross-sectional study. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012; 3(1):12-6. PMC: 3271604. DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.91923. View