» Articles » PMID: 26015817

Depression in Teenager Pregnant Women in a Public Hospital in a Northern Mexican City: Prevalence and Correlates

Overview
Journal J Clin Med Res
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 May 28
PMID 26015817
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Very little is known about prenatal depression in teenagers in Mexico. We determined the prevalence and correlates of prenatal depression in teenager women attending a public hospital in Durango City, Mexico.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study to assess depression in 181 teenager pregnant women who attended a public hospital for prenatal care. We used a validated Mexican version of the Edinburg postnatal depression scale (EPDS) to screen depression. Women with EPDS scores suggestive of depression were further examined to confirm depression by a psychiatric evaluation using the DSM-IV criteria. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the prevalence association with socio-demographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics of the pregnant women.

Results: Of the 181 teenager pregnant women studied, 61 (33.7%) had EPDS equal to or higher than 8 (range 8 - 23), and 37 of them were confirmed to have prenatal depression by the psychiatric evaluation. The general prevalence of prenatal depression in the teenager pregnant women studied was 20.4%. Of the 37 women with depression, 34 suffered from minor depression and three suffered from major depression. Thus, the prevalence of minor and major depression in the women studied was 18.8% and 1.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of the socio-demographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics of the teenager pregnant women showed that prenatal depression was associated with a previous episode of depression during pregnancy (odds ratio (OR) = 6.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68 - 22.30; P = 0.006), and borderline associations with big fetal size (OR = 9.9; 95% CI: 0.94 - 104.24; P = 0.05) and family problems (OR = 3.83; 95% CI: 0.99 - 14.84; P = 0.05).

Conclusions: Results demonstrate that prenatal depression is common in pregnant teenagers in Durango City, Mexico. The history of an episode of depression during pregnancy should alert physicians for further depression episodes during pregnancy in teenagers. Further research to elucidate the association of prenatal depression with size of the fetus and family problems in pregnant teenagers is needed.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and risk factors associated with depression in pregnant adolescents in Nairobi, Kenya.

Tele A, Kathono J, Mwaniga S, Nyongesa V, Yator O, Gachuno O J Affect Disord Rep. 2023; 10.

PMID: 36970124 PMC: 10038142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100424.


Depression and its psychosocial risk factors in pregnant Kenyan adolescents: a cross-sectional study in a community health Centre of Nairobi.

Osok J, Kigamwa P, Vander Stoep A, Huang K, Kumar M BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18(1):136.

PMID: 29776353 PMC: 5960084. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1706-y.


Prenatal Depression Risk Factors, Developmental Effects and Interventions: A Review.

Field T J Pregnancy Child Health. 2017; 4(1).

PMID: 28702506 PMC: 5502770. DOI: 10.4172/2376-127X.1000301.

References
1.
Coelho F, Pinheiro R, Silva R, Quevedo L, Souza L, Castelli R . Major depressive disorder during teenage pregnancy: socio-demographic, obstetric and psychosocial correlates. Braz J Psychiatry. 2013; 35(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbp.2012.03.006. View

2.
Alvarado-Esquivel C, Sifuentes-Alvarez A, Estrada-Martinez S, Salas-Martinez C, Hernandez-Alvarado A, Ortiz-Rocha S . [Prevalence of postnatal depression in women attending public hospitals in Durango, Mexico]. Gac Med Mex. 2010; 146(1):1-9. View

3.
Bowen A, Muhajarine N . Antenatal depression. Can Nurse. 2006; 102(9):26-30. View

4.
Marcus S . Depression during pregnancy: rates, risks and consequences--Motherisk Update 2008. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2009; 16(1):e15-22. View

5.
Ebeid E, Nassif N, Sinha P . Prenatal depression leading to postpartum psychosis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30(5):435-8. DOI: 10.3109/01443611003802321. View